Use of glargine in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a case-control study
- PMID: 18803989
- DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.08.013
Use of glargine in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a case-control study
Abstract
Background: Insulin glargine is a once-daily basal insulin analog with prolonged duration of action and absence of an evident peak. Glargine is associated with reduced frequency of hypoglycemic episodes (mostly nocturnal) as well as effective glycemic control. Maintenance of good metabolic control before conception and throughout pregnancy is essential to lower the risk of fetal malformations. Glargine might be a valuable alternative in the management of pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus. However, because its clinical utility has not been established, the use of glargine is not currently recommended during pregnancy.
Objective: The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate (years 2004-2007) the effectiveness and safety of insulin glargine compared with neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) in women affected by type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) during pregnancy.
Methods: The study comprised pregnant women affected by T1DM who were followed up in the Diabetes and Pregnancy Outpatient Clinic at the University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy, within 8 +/- 3.4 weeks subsequent to a positive pregnancy test. All patients with T1DM were treated with conventional basal-bolus insulin therapy (aspart or lispro analogs at the 3 main meals plus glargine or NPH at bedtime). Healthy pregnant women were used as controls for fetal and neonatal parameters. Patients were consecutively enrolled. In all women, metabolic status was determined daily by mean glycemic values (2-hour postprandial blood glucose) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values (at 3-month intervals). Fetal measurements (<50th and >90th centiles of the head circumference, abdomen circumference, and femoral length) were evaluated by ultrasound at second and third trimesters. Weight and femoral length were assessed at birth, and neonates were classified according to the fetal growth curve for the Italian population (<10th centile = small for gestational age; and >90th centile = large for gestational age (LGA).
Results: A total of 73 pregnant women (30 with T1DM and 43 healthy [control]) were included in the study. Of the 30 diabetic pregnant women included in the study, 15 (mean [SD] age, 27.4 [5.2] years; mean pregravidic weight, 59.7 [11.7] kg) maintained their preconception therapy with glargine, and 15 (mean age, 30.1 [2.4] years; mean pregravidic weight, 60.7 [8.7] kg) with NPH. No significant difference was observed between the glargine-treated group and the NPH-treated group with regard to pregravidic hypertension, third-trimester preeclampsia, maternal complications and/or their progression during pregnancy (diabetic retinopathy, micro- or macroalbuminuria) and episodes of mild hypoglycemia, severe hypoglycemia, and ketosis. There were no significant between group differences in insulin requirements (IU/kg of body weight) and glycemic profile, with the exception of better fasting and 2 hours after breakfast glycemic values in the glargine group during the first (P = 0.008 and P < 0.001, respectively) and the second (P = 0.015 and P = 0.016) trimesters, confirmed by the lower HbA1c levels in the first trimester (P = 0.037). The frequency of femoral length <50th centile at both second and third trimesters was 4/15 (26.7%) in the glargine-treated group (P = 0.033 and P = 0.013, respectively, vs control), 3/15 (20.0%) and 1/15 (6.7%), respectively, in the NPH-treated group (both, P = NS vs control), and 2/43 (4.7%) and 1/43 (2.3%), respectively, in the control group. The prevalence of LGA was 7/15 (46.7%) in the glargine group (P < 0.001 vs control), 4/15 (27.6%) in the NPH group (P = 0.033 vs control), and 2/43 (4.7%) in the control group.
Conclusions: Although our retrospective study involved only a small number of participants, no significant difference was found in glycemic control between glargine and NPH treatments. Use of glargine was associated with a significantly higher frequency of femoral length <50th centile. Further larger prospective studies are necessary to assess the safety profile of glargine in T1DM during pregnancy.
Similar articles
-
Insulin glargine versus neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin for treatment of diabetes in pregnancy.Am J Perinatol. 2009 Jan;26(1):57-62. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1095181. Epub 2008 Oct 31. Am J Perinatol. 2009. PMID: 18979406
-
Intensive replacement of basal insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes given rapid-acting insulin analog at mealtime: a 3-month comparison between administration of NPH insulin four times daily and glargine insulin at dinner or bedtime.Diabetes Care. 2003 May;26(5):1490-6. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.5.1490. Diabetes Care. 2003. PMID: 12716810 Clinical Trial.
-
(Ultra-)long-acting insulin analogues for people with type 1 diabetes mellitus.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 4;3(3):CD013498. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013498.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 33662147 Free PMC article.
-
Glargine is superior to neutral protamine Hagedorn for improving glycated haemoglobin and fasting blood glucose levels during intensive insulin therapy.Intern Med J. 2005 Sep;35(9):536-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2005.00902.x. Intern Med J. 2005. PMID: 16105155 Clinical Trial.
-
Safety of insulin analogs during pregnancy: a meta-analysis.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Oct;292(4):749-56. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3692-3. Epub 2015 Apr 9. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015. PMID: 25855052 Review.
Cited by
-
Managing type 1 diabetes mellitus in pregnancy--from planning to breastfeeding.Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2012 Nov;8(11):659-67. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2012.154. Epub 2012 Sep 11. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2012. PMID: 22965164 Review.
-
Insulin pumps in pregnancy: using technology to achieve normoglycemia in women with diabetes.Curr Diab Rep. 2012 Feb;12(1):53-9. doi: 10.1007/s11892-011-0242-7. Curr Diab Rep. 2012. PMID: 22105415 Review.
-
Meta-Analysis of Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Associated with the Use of Insulin Glargine versus NPH Insulin during Pregnancy.Obstet Gynecol Int. 2012;2012:649070. doi: 10.1155/2012/649070. Epub 2012 May 16. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2012. PMID: 22685467 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of Insulin Analogs Compared with Human Insulins in Pregnant Women with Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2019 Feb;41(2):104-115. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676510. Epub 2019 Feb 20. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2019. PMID: 30786308 Free PMC article.
-
Maternal and neonatal outcomes with the use of long acting, compared to intermediate acting basal insulin (NPH) for managing diabetes during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2022 Oct 21;14(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s13098-022-00925-7. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2022. PMID: 36271431 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
