Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Mar-Jun;681(2-3):189-196.
doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2008.08.002. Epub 2008 Aug 29.

Forty-six genes causing nonsyndromic hearing impairment: which ones should be analyzed in DNA diagnostics?

Affiliations
Review

Forty-six genes causing nonsyndromic hearing impairment: which ones should be analyzed in DNA diagnostics?

Nele Hilgert et al. Mutat Res. 2009 Mar-Jun.

Abstract

Hearing impairment is the most common sensory disorder, present in 1 of every 500 newborns. With 46 genes implicated in nonsyndromic hearing loss, it is also an extremely heterogeneous trait. Here, we categorize for the first time all mutations reported in nonsyndromic deafness genes, both worldwide and more specifically in Caucasians. The most frequent genes implicated in autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss are GJB2, which is responsible for more than half of cases, followed by SLC26A4, MYO15A, OTOF, CDH23 and TMC1. None of the genes associated with autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss accounts for a preponderance of cases, although mutations are somewhat more frequently reported in WFS1, KCNQ4, COCH and GJB2. Only a minority of these genes is currently included in genetic diagnostics, the selection criteria typically reflecting: (1) high frequency as a cause of deafness (i.e. GJB2); (2) association with another recognisable feature (i.e. SLC26A4 and enlarged vestibular aqueduct); or (3) a recognisable audioprofile (i.e. WFS1). New and powerful DNA sequencing technologies have been developed over the past few years, but have not yet found their way into DNA diagnostics. Implementing these technologies is likely to happen within the next 5 years, and will cause a breakthrough in terms of power and cost efficiency. It will become possible to analyze most - if not all - deafness genes, as opposed to one or a few genes currently. This ability will greatly improve DNA diagnostics, provide epidemiological data on gene-based mutation frequencies, and reveal novel genotype-phenotype correlations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Morton CC, Nance WE. Newborn hearing screening--a silent revolution. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2151–2164. - PubMed
    1. Kenneson A, Cannon MJ. Review and meta-analysis of the epidemiology of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Rev Med Virol. 2007;17:253–276. - PubMed
    1. Van Camp G, Willems PJ, Smith RJ. Nonsyndromic hearing impairment: unparalleled heterogeneity. Am J Hum Genet. 1997;60:758–764. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Toriello HV, Reardon W, Gorlin RJ. Hereditary Hearing Loss and its Syndromes. Oxford University Press, Inc; Oxford: 2004.
    1. Cryns K, Van Camp G. Deafness genes and their diagnostic applications. Audiol Neurootol. 2004;9:2–22. - PubMed

Publication types