Computer-Interpretable Guideline formalisms
- PMID: 18806319
- PMCID: PMC2858861
Computer-Interpretable Guideline formalisms
Abstract
Implementing Computer-Interpretable Guidelines (CIGs) in active computer-based decision support systems promises to improve the acceptance and application of guidelines in daily practice. The model and underlying language are the core characteristics of every CIG approach. However, currently no standard model or language has been accepted by the CIG community. This aim of this chapter is to provide an overview of well-known approaches and to formulate a set of (minimal) requirements that can be used in the process of developing new CIG approaches or improving existing ones. It presents five CIG approaches (the Arden Syntax, GLIF, PROforma, Asbru and EON), followed by a general discussion of the strong points of each approach as well as their implications for future research.
Figures
References
-
- James BC. Making it easy to do it right. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(13):991–3. - PubMed
-
- OpenClinical [Accessed March 11, 2008]. Available at: http://www.openclinical.org.
-
- De Clercq PA, Blom JA, Korsten HH, Hasman A. Approaches for creating computer-interpretable guidelines that facilitate decision support. Artif Intell Med. 2004 May;31(1):1–27. - PubMed
-
- Peleg M. Guideline and Workflow Models. In: Greenes Robert A., editor. Medical Decision-Making: Computational Approaches to Achieving Healthcare Quality and Safety. Elsevier/Academic Press; 2006.
-
- Tu S, Musen M. Representation Formalisms and Computational Methods for Modeling Guideline-Based Patient Care. First European Workshop on Computer-based Support for Clinical Guidelines and Protocols. 2000:125–42.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources