Characterizing the perception of the placebo effect in sports medicine
- PMID: 18806551
- DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e318185362a
Characterizing the perception of the placebo effect in sports medicine
Abstract
Objective: To characterize differences in the perception and understanding of the placebo effect between sports physicians, coaches, athletes, and sports science personnel.
Design: A short 11-item questionnaire was administered addressing demographic details, understanding of the placebo effect, and willingness to use the effect in an elite sport setting.
Setting: All participants were involved in national level sporting programs.
Participants: A total of 187 individuals (17 sports physicians, 44 sports scientists, 30 national-level coaches, and 96 national-level athletes) completed the questionnaire. All participants were contacted and invited to participate voluntarily. INTERVENTIONS/ASSESSMENT OF RISK FACTORS: Not applicable.
Main outcome measurements: Self-reported responses on understanding and use of placebo effect in sport.
Results: A total of 94% of physicians and 98% of scientists, but only 44% of athletes, indicated a good understanding of the placebo effect. A majority of scientists (63%) and physicians (59%) administered placebo at least once a year. Most of scientists (95%) and a majority of physicians (71%) either mildly or strongly encouraged use of the placebo in their clinical practice. About 60% of athletes indicated they would not care if they were unknowingly administered a placebo: however, 30% of them would not appreciate being misled.
Conclusions: There is a substantial difference in the level of understanding of the placebo effect between physicians and athletes in elite sport. Although athletes are willing to use the placebo effect, physicians need to be mindful of the manner of its implementation.
Similar articles
-
Use of mouthguard rates among university athletes during sport activities in Erzurum, Turkey.Dent Traumatol. 2009 Jun;25(3):318-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2009.00769.x. Epub 2009 Feb 27. Dent Traumatol. 2009. PMID: 19302200
-
Clinical and laboratory evaluation of upper respiratory symptoms in elite athletes.Clin J Sport Med. 2008 Sep;18(5):438-45. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e318181e501. Clin J Sport Med. 2008. PMID: 18806552
-
Elite athletes' perceptions of the effects of illicit drug use on athletic performance.Clin J Sport Med. 2010 May;20(3):189-92. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e3181df5f87. Clin J Sport Med. 2010. PMID: 20445359
-
Sport psychology: psychologic issues and applications.Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2006 Aug;17(3):519-35. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2006.05.007. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2006. PMID: 16952750 Review.
-
Screening of athletes: Australian experience.Clin J Sport Med. 2004 May;14(3):169-77. doi: 10.1097/00042752-200405000-00010. Clin J Sport Med. 2004. PMID: 15166906 Review.
Cited by
-
Understanding placebo and nocebo effects in the context of sport: A psychological perspective.Eur J Sport Sci. 2020 Apr;20(3):293-301. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2020.1727021. Epub 2020 Feb 23. Eur J Sport Sci. 2020. PMID: 32023170 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Are there placebo or nocebo effects in balancing performance?Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Apr 24;8(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00476-z. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023. PMID: 37093367 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials