Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Sep 22:9:126.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-126.

A new tool for mini-open carpal tunnel release - the PSU retractor

Sunton Wongsiri  1 , Porames Suwanno, Boonsin Tangtrakulwanich, Varah Yuenyongviwat, Ekkarin Wongsiri
Affiliations

A new tool for mini-open carpal tunnel release - the PSU retractor

Sunton Wongsiri et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Mini-open carpal tunnel release has become increasingly popular for the treatment of carpal tunnel surgery. The main advantages are shortening recovery time and return-to-work time. However, the risk of neurovascular injury still remains worrisome.

Methods: In this study, we developed a new retractor (herein called the PSU retractor) modified from the widely used Senn retractor, with the aim of decreasing the risk of neurovascular problems from normal procedure. 3-Dimensional computer design software (SolidWorks Office Premium 2007 SP3.1) was used to construct a 3-D PSU retractor prototype. An amputated arm from a 30-year-old woman diagnosed as synovial sarcoma at the shoulder was used to test the maximal visual length. A mini-surgical incision was performed at 3 cm distal to the transverse wrist crease and a tiny flexible ruler was inserted through the tunnel beneath the skin to measure the maximal visual length.

Results: Our new retractor showed significantly better maximal visual length compared to the Senn retractor (47.7(8.1) mm vs. 39.2(6.5) mm). In addition, most assessors expressed a higher satisfaction rate with the PSU retractor than with the Senn retractor (7.3 (1.9) vs. 6.3 (1.1)).

Conclusion: In conclusion, we have developed a promising new retractor using a computer design program, which appears to be an improvement on the currently available equipment used for mini-open carpal tunnel surgery. However, further clinical studies are needed to confirm our initial findings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
3D model of PSU retractor. 3D model of PSU retractor has created by SolidWorks program (A), (B).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bilateral concave and taper blade of PSU retractor. PSU retractor (A) has bilateral concave (white arrow) and taper blade (black arrow) for aid insertion compared to Senn retractor (B).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Concave curve with bilateral wing of PSU retractor. Demonstrated concave curve (white arrow) at distal end with bilateral wing (black arrow) of PSU retractor to aid for watching and cutting transverse carpal ligament (A) as compared with Senn retractor (B).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Two sizes in blade of PSU retractor. Demonstrated two different sizes in blade of PSU retractor.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The maximum visual length. The maximum visual length was defined as the farest distance seen on scale of the ruler from the proximal edge of skin incision.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The graph of the yield strength and the ultimate strength of both Senn and PSU retractor. The yield strength and the ultimate strength of both Senn and PSU retractor were comparable from finite element analysis.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jerosch-Herold C, Leite JC, Song F. A systematic review of outcomes assessed in randomized controlled trials of surgical interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome using the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) as a reference tool. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7:96. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-96. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taleisnik J. The palmar cutaneous branch of the median nerve and the approach to the carpal tunnel. An anatomical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973;55:1212–1217. - PubMed
    1. Citron ND, Bendall SP. Local symptoms after open carpal tunnel release. A randomized prospective trial of two incisions. J Hand Surg [Br] 1997;22:317–321. - PubMed
    1. Geere J, Chester R, Kale S, Jerosch-Herold C. Power grip, pinch grip, manual muscle testing or thenar atrophy – which should be assessed as a motor outcome after carpal tunnel decompression? A systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007;8:114. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-114. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jugovac I, Burgic N, Micovic V, Radolovic-Prenc L, Uravic M, Golubovic V, Stancic MF. Carpal tunnel release by limited palmar incision vs traditional open technique: randomized controlled trial. Croat Med J. 2002;43:33–36. - PubMed

Publication types