Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jan;467(1):219-24.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0480-4. Epub 2008 Sep 24.

Midterm to long-term followup of staged reimplantation for infected hip arthroplasty

Affiliations

Midterm to long-term followup of staged reimplantation for infected hip arthroplasty

Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jan.

Abstract

Most reports on two-stage reimplantation have focused on the short-term cure rate of infection, but little is known about long-term reinfection-free survival or mechanical durability. We retrospectively reviewed 168 patients (169 hips) with infected arthroplasty, all of whom had two-stage reimplantation for the treatment of an infected total hip arthroplasty between 1988 and 1998. In the second stage, the femoral component was fixed with antibiotic-loaded bone cement in 121 hips; the remaining femoral components and all acetabular components were uncemented. The minimum followup time was 2 years (mean, 7 years; range, 2-16 years). At most recent followup, 12 hips (7.1%) were reoperated on for reinfection and 13 hips (7.7%) were revised for aseptic loosening or osteolysis. Apparently aseptic loosening occurred on one or both sides of the joint in 24 hips (14.2%). The 10-year survivals free of reinfection and mechanical failure were 87.5% and 75.2% respectively. Nineteen hips dislocated and eight underwent revision surgery for instability. The method of femoral component fixation, either with or without cement, did not correlate with risk of infection, loosening, or mechanical failure. Based on these results, the method of fixation used for the femoral component during two-stage reimplantation surgery should be based on the surgeon's preference for fixation combined with the assessment of femoral bone stock.

Level of evidence: Level IV, case series. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1A–C
Fig. 1A–C
Kaplan–Meier survivorship curves are shown for (A) reinfection, (B) femoral loosening, and (C) mechanical failure as end points.
Fig. 2A–E
Fig. 2A–E
(A) This figure shows a well-fixed cemented femoral component 5 years after reimplantation; (B) a well-fixed cemented femoral component 8 years after reimplantation; (C) a loose femoral component 6 years after reimplantation in a patient free of infection; (D) a well-fixed uncemented fully coated stem 6 years after reimplantation; (E) and a well-fixed uncemented fully-coated stem 2 years after reimplantation. Note the well-healed extended trochanteric osteotomy.

References

    1. Bozic KJ, Ries MD. The impact of infection after total hip arthroplasty on hospital and surgeon resource utilization. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1746–1751. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Colyer RA, Capello WN. Surgical treatment of the infected hip implant. Two-stage reimplantation with a one-month interval. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;298:75–79. - PubMed
    1. Davis CM 3rd, Berry DJ, Harmsen WS. Cemented revision of failed uncemented femoral components of total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1264–1269. - PubMed
    1. Duncan CP, Masri BA. The role of antibiotic-loaded cement in the treatment of an infection after a hip replacement. Instr Course Lect. 1995;44:305–313. - PubMed
    1. Fehring TK, Calton TF, Griffin WL. Cementless fixation in 2-stage reimplantation for periprosthetic sepsis. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:175–181. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms