Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Dec;48(12):1164-8.
doi: 10.1007/s00117-008-1692-z.

[Presaccal stenosis as a cause of epiphora]

[Article in German]
Affiliations

[Presaccal stenosis as a cause of epiphora]

[Article in German]
M Lüchtenberg et al. Radiologe. 2008 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Dacryocystographic evaluation of the location of stenoses of the lacrimal pathways was carried out in patients with epiphora to define the frequency and morphology of canalicular stenosis.

Patients and methods: Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) dacryocystograms of 55 consecutive patients with severe epiphora and stenoses of the lacrimal draining system were reviewed in a consensus between three evaluators to determine radiomorphologic criteria for the diagnosis of canalicular stenosis. In 9 cases 3D rotational dacryocystography was additionally used.

Results: A total of 80 stenotic lesions were detected including 19 (24%) canalicular, 26 (32%) saccal and 35 (44%) ductal stenoses. In 9 of the patients 3D rotational dacryocystography was used to differentiate between canalicular (n=4) and saccal (n=5) stenosis. Increased resistance during continuous injection of contrast material and lack of distension of the distal ductal system were the main criteria for diagnosis of canalicular stenosis.

Conclusion: Presaccal stenoses accounted for nearly 25% of the stenoses found in this study. This type of stenosis occurs frequently and should not be overlooked on dacryocystography. 3D rotational dacryocystography may be helpful in unclear cases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ophthalmologe. 1999 Jul;96(7):443-7 - PubMed
    1. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000 Jun-Jul;21(6):1145-50 - PubMed
    1. Ophthalmology. 1986 Aug;93(8):1055-63 - PubMed
    1. Ophthalmologe. 2000 Oct;97(10):692-5 - PubMed
    1. Ophthalmologe. 1998 Dec;95(12):820-2 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources