Nasal insulin to prevent type 1 diabetes in children with HLA genotypes and autoantibodies conferring increased risk of disease: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 18814906
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61309-4
Nasal insulin to prevent type 1 diabetes in children with HLA genotypes and autoantibodies conferring increased risk of disease: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Background: In mouse models of diabetes, prophylactic administration of insulin reduced incidence of the disease. We investigated whether administration of nasal insulin decreased the incidence of type 1 diabetes, in children with HLA genotypes and autoantibodies increasing the risk of the disease.
Methods: At three university hospitals in Turku, Oulu, and Tampere (Finland), we analysed cord blood samples of 116 720 consecutively born infants, and 3430 of their siblings, for the HLA-DQB1 susceptibility alleles for type 1 diabetes. 17 397 infants and 1613 siblings had increased genetic risk, of whom 11 225 and 1574, respectively, consented to screening of diabetes-associated autoantibodies at every 3-12 months. In a double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 224 infants and 40 siblings positive for two or more autoantibodies, in consecutive samples, to receive short-acting human insulin (1 unit/kg; n=115 and n=22) or placebo (n=109 and n=18) once a day intranasally. We used a restricted randomisation, stratified by site, with permuted blocks of size two. Primary endpoint was diagnosis of diabetes. Analysis was by intention to treat. The study was terminated early because insulin had no beneficial effect. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00223613.
Findings: Median duration of the intervention was 1.8 years (range 0-9.7). Diabetes was diagnosed in 49 index children randomised to receive insulin, and in 47 randomised to placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 1.14; 95% CI 0.73-1.77). 42 and 38 of these children, respectively, continued treatment until diagnosis, with yearly rates of diabetes onset of 16.8% (95% CI 11.7-21.9) and 15.3% (10.5-20.2). Seven siblings were diagnosed with diabetes in the insulin group, versus six in the placebo group (HR 1.93; 0.56-6.77). In all randomised children, diabetes was diagnosed in 56 in the insulin group, and 53 in the placebo group (HR 0.98; 0.67-1.43, p=0.91).
Interpretation: In children with HLA-conferred susceptibility to diabetes, administration of nasal insulin, started soon after detection of autoantibodies, could not be shown to prevent or delay type 1 diabetes.
Comment in
-
Prevention of type 1 diabetes: what next?Lancet. 2008 Nov 15;372(9651):1710-1. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61310-0. Epub 2008 Sep 22. Lancet. 2008. PMID: 18814907 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Geographical variation in risk HLA-DQB1 genotypes for type 1 diabetes and signs of beta-cell autoimmunity in a high-incidence country.Diabetes Care. 2004 Mar;27(3):676-81. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.3.676. Diabetes Care. 2004. PMID: 14988284
-
Human leukocyte antigen identity and DQ risk alleles in autoantibody-positive siblings of children with IDDM are associated with reduced early insulin response. Childhood Diabetes in Finland (DiMe) Study Group.Diabetes. 1995 Sep;44(9):1021-8. doi: 10.2337/diab.44.9.1021. Diabetes. 1995. PMID: 7657023
-
HLA-DQB1 genotypes and islet cell antibodies in the identification of siblings at risk for insulin-dependent diabetes (IDDM) in Finland. Childhood Diabetes in Finland (DiMe) Study Group.J Autoimmun. 1994 Oct;7(5):675-86. doi: 10.1006/jaut.1994.1052. J Autoimmun. 1994. PMID: 7840859
-
Early feeding and risk of type 1 diabetes: experiences from the Trial to Reduce Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in the Genetically at Risk (TRIGR).Am J Clin Nutr. 2011 Dec;94(6 Suppl):1814S-1820S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.110.000711. Epub 2011 Jun 8. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011. PMID: 21653795 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Primary and secondary prevention of Type 1 diabetes.Diabet Med. 2013 Feb;30(2):161-9. doi: 10.1111/dme.12100. Diabet Med. 2013. PMID: 23231526 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Antigen-based vs. systemic immunomodulation in type 1 diabetes: the pros and cons.Islets. 2013 Mar-Apr;5(2):53-66. doi: 10.4161/isl.24785. Epub 2013 Mar 1. Islets. 2013. PMID: 23648893 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Influenza A virus antibodies show no association with pancreatic islet autoantibodies in children genetically predisposed to type 1 diabetes.Diabetologia. 2015 Nov;58(11):2592-5. doi: 10.1007/s00125-015-3723-4. Epub 2015 Aug 8. Diabetologia. 2015. PMID: 26253765
-
Primary prevention for type 1 diabetes mellitus?Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015 Aug;11(8):451-2. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2015.95. Epub 2015 Jun 16. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015. PMID: 26077263 No abstract available.
-
Intralymphatic glutamic acid decarboxylase administration in type 1 diabetes patients induced a distinctive early immune response in patients with DR3DQ2 haplotype.Front Immunol. 2023 Feb 2;14:1112570. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1112570. eCollection 2023. Front Immunol. 2023. PMID: 36817467 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Mouse models for the study of autoimmune type 1 diabetes: a NOD to similarities and differences to human disease.Semin Immunopathol. 2011 Jan;33(1):67-87. doi: 10.1007/s00281-010-0204-1. Epub 2010 Apr 28. Semin Immunopathol. 2011. PMID: 20424843 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials