Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1991 Apr;38(3-4):131-41.

Fulminant hepatic failure: to transplant or not to transplant

Affiliations
  • PMID: 1881500
Review

Fulminant hepatic failure: to transplant or not to transplant

R J de Knegt et al. Neth J Med. 1991 Apr.

Abstract

Despite progress in intensive care regimens and the introduction of various hepatic support procedures, the survival rate for fulminant hepatic failure remained around 20%. In the past few years, orthotopic liver transplantation has increased the survival rate to more than 50% and thus is generally considered the treatment of choice. However, since about 20% of the patients on standard therapy recover spontaneously, not all patients presenting with fulminant hepatic failure should undergo transplantation immediately. Therefore attempts should be made to identify the patients with "potentially reversible" liver disease in an early phase. In this article strategies for deciding which therapy fits the individual patient are proposed. The decision "to transplant or not to transplant" should be based on residual functioning liver-cell mass (e.g. factor V is less or greater than 15%), the presence or absence of systemic complications such as lactic acidosis and renal failure and the aetiology of the liver disease (e.g. reversible causes such as viral hepatitis B and irreversible causes such as Wilson's disease). A flow diagram has been constructed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources