Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2008 Dec;39(12):3131-6.
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.521427. Epub 2008 Sep 25.

Recurrent stroke and massive right-to-left shunt: results from the prospective Spanish multicenter (CODICIA) study

Collaborators, Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Recurrent stroke and massive right-to-left shunt: results from the prospective Spanish multicenter (CODICIA) study

Joaquín Serena et al. Stroke. 2008 Dec.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Few studies have prospectively examined the risk of recurrent stroke associated with patent foramen ovale. We present the results of the Spanish right-to-left shunt (RLSh) multicenter study.

Methods: Four hundred eighty-six patients with cryptogenic stoke were included at 17 participating hospitals. Patients were examined by contrast transcranial Doppler methods at baseline. The magnitude of RLSh was quantified during the Valsalva maneuver. Transthoracic and/or transesophageal echocardiography, computed tomography scan, or magnetic resonance imaging was performed. Functional outcome and stroke recurrence were evaluated at 3 months and yearly thereafter. The independent relation between RLSh magnitude and stroke recurrence was analyzed by logistic-regression analysis in the whole group and in the younger subgroup (<55 years).

Results: Massive RLSh was detected in 200 patients (41.2%). The mean follow-up was 729+/-411 days. Stroke recurrence was low (5.8%, n=28) and similar in patients with massive RLSh, with nonmassive RLSh, and with no RLSh, in both the younger group (3.4% vs 2.3% vs 4.5%, respectively; P=0.75) and in the whole population (5.0% vs 6.2% vs 6.3%, respectively; P=0.58). Regression analysis found no association between massive RLSh and recurrent stroke in either group (in the whole population, odds ratio=0.94; 95% CI, 0.36 to 2.40; P=0.89; in the younger population, odds ratio=0.93; 95% CI, 0.18 to 4.91; P=0.93). These results were similar when concurrent atrial septal aneurysm and massive RLSh were analyzed and when antithrombotic treatment and concomitant stroke risk factors were included.

Conclusions: These results suggest that neither massive RLSh nor massive RLSh with concurrent atrial septal aneurysm is an independent risk factor for recurrent stroke, in either the general or younger stroke populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

MeSH terms