Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2008 Dec;12(12):2103-8; discussion 2108-9.
doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0706-5. Epub 2008 Sep 27.

Single-blinded randomized trial of mechanical bowel preparation for colon surgery with primary intraperitoneal anastomosis

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Single-blinded randomized trial of mechanical bowel preparation for colon surgery with primary intraperitoneal anastomosis

María Jesús Pena-Soria et al. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: We report the final analysis of a prospective single-blinded randomized trial designed to investigate whether omission of preoperative mechanical bowel preparation increases the rate of surgical-site infection and anastomotic failure after elective colon surgery with intraperitoneal anastomosis by a single surgeon.

Patients and methods: Patients scheduled to undergo an elective colon or proximal rectal resection with a primary anastomosis by a single surgeon were randomized to receive either oral polyethylene glycol (Group A) or no mechanical bowel preparation (Group B). Patients were followed by an independent surgeon.

Results: One hundred and forty nine patients were enrolled. Three patients (2%) were preoperatively excluded because of active immunosuppression and 13 (9%) were excluded from the final analysis. Of the remaining 129 patients, 65 were assigned to Group A and 64 to Group B. Thirty patients (23.2%) developed wound infection, (Group A = 24.6% and Group B = 17.2%; NS). There were three cases of intra-abdominal sepsis a (Group A 4.6%). The anastomotic failure rate was 5.4% (n = 7), four patients in Group A (6.2%) vs. three patients in Group B (4.7%) (NS). When SSI and anastomotic failure were combined, the complication rate in Group A was 35.4% vs. 21.9% for Group B. The NNH was 7.4.

Conclusion: Our final analysis shows that a single surgeon will not have a higher rate of either surgical-site infection or anastomotic failure if he/she routinely omits preoperative mechanical bowel preparation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chemotherapy. 2005;51 Suppl 1:115-21 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 2004 May;239(5):599-605; discussion 605-7 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 2007 Dec 22;370(9605):2112-7 - PubMed
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Jul;51(7):1004-9 - PubMed
    1. Arch Surg. 2005 Mar;140(3):285-8 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources