Patient preferences and National Health Service costs: a cost-consequences analysis of cancer genetic services
- PMID: 18821034
- DOI: 10.1007/s10689-008-9217-5
Patient preferences and National Health Service costs: a cost-consequences analysis of cancer genetic services
Abstract
The study has three aims; firstly to establish if, having been informed of their risk status and that gene testing is inappropriate for them, low and moderate risk patients have misunderstood or failed to grasp this and want a test that is inappropriate for them. Secondly, to elicit patients' willingness to pay for cancer genetic services. Thirdly, to ascertain the aspects of cancer genetics services that are important to high risk patients and present service configurations prioritised in terms of preferences accompanied by their costs (cost-consequences analysis). Patient preferences were gathered from 120 patients returning a self-administered discrete choice questionnaire issued post genetic risk assessment. Patients at low and moderate risk of developing breast cancer desired inappropriate testing. Patients at high, moderate and low risk of developing genetic cancer were willing to pay up to 3,000 pounds for genetic serviced, which exceeds the current estimated cost of providing testing and counselling. Counselling by a genetics associate accompanied by favourable levels of other attributes provided high utility and substantial cost savings.
Similar articles
-
A micro costing of NHS cancer genetic services.Br J Cancer. 2005 Jan 17;92(1):60-71. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602270. Br J Cancer. 2005. PMID: 15583691 Free PMC article.
-
Health economics and genetic service development: a familial cancer genetic example.Fam Cancer. 2004;3(1):61-7. doi: 10.1023/B:FAME.0000026812.87551.bf. Fam Cancer. 2004. PMID: 15131408 Clinical Trial.
-
Valuing the delivery of dental care: Heterogeneity in patients' preferences and willingness-to-pay for dental care attributes.J Dent. 2018 Feb;69:93-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.12.005. Epub 2017 Dec 11. J Dent. 2018. PMID: 29242040
-
Improving the referral process for familial breast cancer genetic counselling: findings of three randomised controlled trials of two interventions.Health Technol Assess. 2005 Feb;9(3):iii-iv, 1-126. doi: 10.3310/hta9030. Health Technol Assess. 2005. PMID: 15694064 Review.
-
Patient Preferences Regarding Colorectal Cancer Screening: Test Features and Cost Willing to Pay Out of Pocket.Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2016 May-Jun;45(3):189-92. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2015.12.002. Epub 2015 Dec 15. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2016. PMID: 26774952 Review.
Cited by
-
Genetic risk, perceived risk, and cancer worry in daughters of breast cancer patients.J Genet Couns. 2011 Apr;20(2):157-64. doi: 10.1007/s10897-010-9336-7. Epub 2010 Dec 4. J Genet Couns. 2011. PMID: 21132457 Free PMC article.
-
The Department of Health-supported genetic counsellor training post scheme in England: a unique initiative?J Community Genet. 2012 Oct;3(4):297-302. doi: 10.1007/s12687-012-0100-6. Epub 2012 May 31. J Community Genet. 2012. PMID: 22648480 Free PMC article.
-
Value of Genetic Testing for Hereditary Colorectal Cancer in a Probability-Based US Online Sample.Med Decis Making. 2015 Aug 1;35(6):734-744. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14565820. Epub 2015 Jan 14. Med Decis Making. 2015. PMID: 25589525 Free PMC article.
-
Genomic testing to determine drug response: measuring preferences of the public and patients using Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE).BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Oct 31;13:454. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-454. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013. PMID: 24176050 Free PMC article.
-
Public Preferences for Genetic and Genomic Risk-Informed Chronic Disease Screening and Early Detection: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 May;23(3):395-408. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00893-1. Epub 2024 Jun 25. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025. PMID: 38916649 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical