Experience of IUD/IUS insertions and clinical performance in nulliparous women--a pilot study
- PMID: 18821462
- DOI: 10.1080/02699200802253706
Experience of IUD/IUS insertions and clinical performance in nulliparous women--a pilot study
Abstract
Objectives: To assess experience of insertion and use, by nulliparous women, of intrauterine devices (IUDs) and intrauterine systems (IUSs) and the feasibility of a large comparative study.
Methods: Prospective pilot study of women attending for interval insertion of IUD/IUS or emergency IUD. Problems and experience of the procedure were noted. At three months and one year continuation rates, satisfaction levels and problems were recorded. Case notes were reviewed for non-responders.
Results: Between May and October 2005, 117 nulliparous women were recruited. Nine had an IUS inserted, and 104 an IUD. Despite a reasonable level of pain at insertion most women gave broadly positive descriptions of the procedure. At one year, 65 women were known to still have their original device. Fifteen had it removed; in six women it was expelled. The satisfaction score was high. There were no pregnancies or perforations.
Conclusions: Insertion of IUD/IUS was well tolerated by the majority. Continuation and satisfaction rates were high. The IUD/IUS should be offered to nulliparous women as part of the full contraceptive menu. The ease of recruitment in this pilot study suggests that a larger study is feasible.
Similar articles
-
The Femilis LNG-IUS: contraceptive performance-an interim analysis.Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2009 Apr;14(2):103-10. doi: 10.1080/13625180802706059. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2009. PMID: 19340705
-
Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.Prescrire Int. 2009 Jun;18(101):125-30. Prescrire Int. 2009. PMID: 19637436
-
Ease of insertion, contraceptive efficacy and safety of new T-shaped levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems.Contraception. 2005 Jun;71(6):465-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.12.021. Contraception. 2005. PMID: 15914138
-
The levonorgestrel intrauterine system in nulliparous women.Contraception. 2007 Jun;75(6 Suppl):S12-5. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.01.018. Epub 2007 Apr 3. Contraception. 2007. PMID: 17531602 Review.
-
Intrauterine devices and intrauterine systems.Hum Reprod Update. 2008 May-Jun;14(3):197-208. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmn003. Epub 2008 Apr 9. Hum Reprod Update. 2008. PMID: 18400840 Review.
Cited by
-
Long-acting reversible contraception for adolescents.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Oct;24(5):293-8. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32835686d5. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012. PMID: 22781078 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Intrauterine contraception in nulliparous women: a prospective survey.J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2016 Jan;42(1):36-42. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2014-101046. Epub 2015 Apr 8. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2016. PMID: 25854550 Free PMC article.
-
A review of barriers and myths preventing the more widespread use of intrauterine contraception in nulliparous women.Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2012 Oct;17(5):340-50. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2012.700744. Epub 2012 Jul 26. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2012. PMID: 22834648 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Challenges in the gynecologic care of premenopausal women with breast cancer.Mayo Clin Proc. 2011 Mar;86(3):229-40. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0794. Epub 2011 Feb 9. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011. PMID: 21307388 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Interventions for the prevention of pain associated with the placement of intrauterine contraceptives: An updated review.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Dec;98(12):1500-1513. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13662. Epub 2019 Jun 27. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019. PMID: 31112295 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical