Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Feb;154(2):272-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.07.047. Epub 2008 Sep 25.

Prediction of child abuse risk from emergency department use

Affiliations

Prediction of child abuse risk from emergency department use

Elisabeth Guenther et al. J Pediatr. 2009 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To examine whether pre-abuse rates and patterns of emergency department (ED) visits between children with supported child abuse and age-matched control subjects are useful markers for abuse risk.

Study design: A population-based case-control study using probabilistic linkage of four statewide data sets. Cases were abused children <13 years of age, identified between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2002. For each case, a birth date-matched, population-based control was obtained. Outcome measures were rate ratios of ED visits in cases compared with control subjects.

Results: Cases (n = 9795) and control subjects (n = 9795) met inclusion criteria; 4574 cases (47%) had an ED visit; thus linked to the ED database versus 2647 control subjects (27%). The crude ED visit rate per 10,000 person-days of exposure was 8.2 visits for cases compared with 3.9 visits for control subjects. Cases were almost twice as likely as control subjects (adjusted rate ratio = 1.8; 95% CI, 1.5, 1.8) to have had a prior ED visit. Leading ED discharge diagnoses were similar for both groups.

Conclusions: Children with supported child abuse have higher ED use before abuse diagnosis, when compared with the general pediatric population. However, neither the rate of ED use nor the pattern of diagnoses offers sufficient specificity to be useful markers of risk for abuse.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A comparison of the distribution of ED visits, by percentage, between cases and controls from the start of the study to diagnosis of abuse or end date.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hoyert DL, Heron MP, Murphy SL, Kung HC. Deaths: Final data for 2003. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2006;54:1–120. - PubMed
    1. Jenny C, Hymel KP, Ritzen A, Reinert SE, Hay TC. Analysis of missed cases of abusive head trauma. JAMA. 1999;281:621–6. - PubMed
    1. Alexander R, Crabbe L, Sato Y, Smith W, Bennett T. Serial abuse in children who are shaken. Am J Dis Child. 1990;144:58–60. - PubMed
    1. Blumenthal I. Shaken baby syndrome. Postgrad Med J. 2002;78:732–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Feldman KW. Patterned abusive bruises of the buttocks and the pinnae. Pediatrics. 1992;90:633–6. - PubMed

Publication types