Category and perceptual interference in second-language phoneme learning: an examination of English /w/-/v/ learning by Sinhala, German, and Dutch speakers
- PMID: 18823213
- DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1305
Category and perceptual interference in second-language phoneme learning: an examination of English /w/-/v/ learning by Sinhala, German, and Dutch speakers
Abstract
The present study investigated the perception and production of English /w/ and /v/ by native speakers of Sinhala, German, and Dutch, with the aim of examining how their native language phonetic processing affected the acquisition of these phonemes. Subjects performed a battery of tests that assessed their identification accuracy for natural recordings, their degree of spoken accent, their relative use of place and manner cues, the assimilation of these phonemes into native-language categories, and their perceptual maps (i.e., multidimensional scaling solutions) for these phonemes. Most Sinhala speakers had near-chance identification accuracy, Germans ranged from chance to 100% correct, and Dutch speakers had uniformly high accuracy. The results suggest that these learning differences were caused more by perceptual interference than by category assimilation; Sinhala and German speakers both have a single native-language phoneme that is similar to English /w/ and /v/, but the auditory sensitivities of Sinhala speakers make it harder for them to discern the acoustic cues that are critical to /w/-/v/ categorization.
Similar articles
-
Phonetic perceptual identification by native- and second-language speakers differentially activates brain regions involved with acoustic phonetic processing and those involved with articulatory-auditory/orosensory internal models.Neuroimage. 2004 Jul;22(3):1182-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.006. Neuroimage. 2004. PMID: 15219590
-
Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems II: Auditory training for native Spanish and German speakers.J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Aug;126(2):866-77. doi: 10.1121/1.3148196. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009. PMID: 19640051
-
Perceptual assimilation and L2 learning: evidence from the perception of Southern British English vowels by native speakers of Greek and Japanese.Phonetica. 2009;66(3):169-87. doi: 10.1159/000235659. Epub 2009 Sep 14. Phonetica. 2009. PMID: 19776666
-
Perceptual learning for speech.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Aug;71(6):1207-18. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.6.1207. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009. PMID: 19633336 Review.
-
Perceptual processing of Mandarin nasals by L1 and L2 Mandarin speakers.J Psycholinguist Res. 2012 Aug;41(4):237-52. doi: 10.1007/s10936-011-9190-2. J Psycholinguist Res. 2012. PMID: 22089521 Review.
Cited by
-
Phonetic accommodation in non-native directed speech supports L2 word learning and pronunciation.Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 2;13(1):21282. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48648-7. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 38042906 Free PMC article.
-
The role of L1-L2 dissimilarity in L2 segment learning - Implications from the acquisition of English post-alveolar fricatives by Mandarin and Mandarin/Wu speakers.Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 13;13:1017724. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1017724. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 36582315 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of overnight consolidation in the perceptual learning of non-native tonal contrasts.PLoS One. 2019 Dec 12;14(12):e0221498. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221498. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31830045 Free PMC article.
-
Can native Japanese listeners learn to differentiate/r-l/on the basis of F3 onset frequency?Biling (Camb Engl). 2012 Apr;15(2):434-435. doi: 10.1017/S1366728912000041. Biling (Camb Engl). 2012. PMID: 23308038 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of high versus low talker variability and individual aptitude on phonetic training of Mandarin lexical tones.PeerJ. 2019 Aug 9;7:e7191. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7191. eCollection 2019. PeerJ. 2019. PMID: 31413927 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources