Porous tantalum cones for large metaphyseal tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: a minimum 2-year follow-up
- PMID: 18823749
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.08.011
Porous tantalum cones for large metaphyseal tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: a minimum 2-year follow-up
Abstract
Sixteen cases of revision total knee arthroplasty requiring the use of porous tantalum tibial cones for 2 T2A, 3 T2B, 4 T3A, and 7 T3B tibial bone defects (Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute classification) after 13 cases of aseptic loosening and 3 cases of staged reimplantation for infection were reviewed. At an average 31 months (24-38), no patients were lost to follow-up. There were 2 cases of recurrent sepsis requiring removal of a well-fixed cone. In the remaining 14 cases, the reconstructions were functioning well with no reoperations. Radiographs demonstrated reestablishment of the joint line, neutral mechanical axis (average, 5.4 degrees of valgus), and signs of stable osteointegration into the cones. Good short-term results were achieved in complex revisions, with these new reconstructive tools.
Similar articles
-
Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty: a five to nine-year follow-up.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Feb 4;97(3):216-23. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00540. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015. PMID: 25653322
-
Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones for Severe Femoral and Tibial Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty are Reliable for Fixation at Mean 5-Year Follow-Up.J Arthroplasty. 2024 Sep;39(9S2):S374-S379. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.022. Epub 2024 Mar 18. J Arthroplasty. 2024. PMID: 38508344
-
Addressing large tibial osseous defects in primary total knee arthroplasty using porous tantalum cones.Knee. 2019 Jan;26(1):228-239. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.11.001. Epub 2018 Dec 14. Knee. 2019. PMID: 30554910
-
Aseptic Loosening of Porous Metaphyseal Sleeves and Tantalum Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.J Knee Surg. 2021 Aug;34(10):1033-1041. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701434. Epub 2020 Feb 19. J Knee Surg. 2021. PMID: 32074656
-
Cementless Porous Tantalum Monoblock Tibia vs Cemented Modular Tibia in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.J Arthroplasty. 2017 Feb;32(2):666-674. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.09.011. Epub 2016 Sep 28. J Arthroplasty. 2017. PMID: 27776898 Review.
Cited by
-
Revision arthroplasty: an update.Skeletal Radiol. 2009 Nov;38(11):1031-6. doi: 10.1007/s00256-009-0781-z. Skeletal Radiol. 2009. PMID: 19701811 Review. No abstract available.
-
Porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves and MBT implant for severe bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty: a mean 2.4-year follow-up.Arthroplasty. 2020 Apr 20;2(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s42836-020-00031-x. Arthroplasty. 2020. PMID: 35236430 Free PMC article.
-
Tibial component with and without stem extension in a trabecular metal cone construct.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Nov;25(11):3644-3652. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4271-2. Epub 2016 Sep 3. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017. PMID: 27592329 Free PMC article.
-
Usefulness of Trabecular Metal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in a Korean Population: A Case Series.Orthop Res Rev. 2022 Jun 9;14:199-206. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S365377. eCollection 2022. Orthop Res Rev. 2022. PMID: 35707697 Free PMC article.
-
Tantalum Cones Provide Durable Mid-term Fixation in Revision TKA.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Oct;473(10):3176-82. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4338-2. Epub 2015 May 13. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015. PMID: 25968895 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical