Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2008 Sep-Oct;79(5):1395-414.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01195.x.

The family check-up with high-risk indigent families: preventing problem behavior by increasing parents' positive behavior support in early childhood

Thomas J Dishion  1 , Daniel Shaw, Arin Connell, Frances Gardner, Chelsea Weaver, Melvin Wilson
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The family check-up with high-risk indigent families: preventing problem behavior by increasing parents' positive behavior support in early childhood

Thomas J Dishion et al. Child Dev. 2008 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Seven hundred thirty-one income-eligible families in 3 geographical regions who were enrolled in a national food supplement program were screened and randomized to a brief family intervention. At child ages 2 and 3, the intervention group caregivers were offered the Family Check-Up and linked parenting support services. Latent growth models on caregiver reports at child ages 2, 3, and 4 revealed decreased behavior problems when compared with the control group. Intervention effects occurred predominantly among families reporting high levels of problem behavior at child age 2. Families in the intervention condition improved on direct observation measures of caregivers' positive behavior support at child ages 2 and 3; improvements in positive behavior support mediated improvements in children's early problem behavior.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Theoretical framework for the early steps intervention.
Figure 2
Figure 2
An overview of the recruitment, assessment, and randomization protocol.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mediation model overview: Test of indirect path from treatment to age 3 positive behavior support to slope of problem behavior.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Change from ages 2 through 4 years on the Eyberg measure of child problem behavior (ITT).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Positive behavior support: Stability and intervention effect. Note. P–C = parent-child. *p < .05.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Mediation model: Child Behavior Checklist Externalizing. *p < .05.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Mediation model: Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory. *p < .05.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA. University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth & Families; Burlington: 2001. Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles: Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 6−18, Teacher's Report Form, & Youth Self-Report.
    1. Baldwin DA. Understanding the link between joint attention and language. In: Dunham PJ, Moore C, editors. Joint attention: Its origins and roles in development. Erlbaum; Hillsdale, NJ: 1995. pp. 131–158.
    1. Baldwin DA, Bill B, Desjardins RN, Irwin JM, Markman EM. Infants’ reliance on social criterion for establishing word–object relations. Journal of Child Development. 1996;67:3135–3153. - PubMed
    1. Baydar N, Reid MJ, Webster-Stratton C. The role of mental health factors and program engagement in the effectiveness of a preventive parenting program for Head Start mothers. Child Development. 2003;74:1433–1453. - PubMed
    1. Bradley RH, Corwyn RF, McAdoo HP, Garcia-Coll C. The home environments of children in the United States. Part I: Variations by age, ethnicity, and poverty status. Child Development. 2001;72:1844–1867. - PubMed

Publication types