Pro/con debate: is the scoop and run approach the best approach to trauma services organization?
- PMID: 18828868
- PMCID: PMC2592727
- DOI: 10.1186/cc6980
Pro/con debate: is the scoop and run approach the best approach to trauma services organization?
Abstract
You are asked to be involved in organizing a trauma service for a major urban center. You are asked to make a decision on whether the services general approach to trauma in the city (which does have a well-established trauma center) will be scoop and run (minimal resuscitation at the scene with a goal to getting the patient to a trauma center as quickly as possible) or on-the-scene resuscitation with transfer following some degree of stabilization.
References
-
- Trunkey DD. Trauma. Accidental and intentional injuries account for more years of life lost in the U.S. than cancer and heart disease. Among the prescribed remedies are improved preventive efforts, speedier surgery and further research. Sci Am. 1983;249:28–35. - PubMed
-
- Fortune JB, Judkins DG, Scanzaroli D, McLeod KB, Johnson SB. Efficacy of prehospital surgical cricothyrotomy in trauma patients. J Trauma. 1997;42:832–836. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources