Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Nov;90(8):658-62.
doi: 10.1308/003588408X318156. Epub 2008 Sep 30.

Dislocation following total hip replacement: the Avon Orthopaedic Centre experience

Affiliations

Dislocation following total hip replacement: the Avon Orthopaedic Centre experience

Ashley W Blom et al. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008 Nov.

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and outcome of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty at our unit.

Patients and methods: In total, 1727 primary total joint arthroplasties and 305 revision total hip arthroplasties were performed between 1993 and 1996 at our unit. We followed up 1567 (91%) of the primary hip arthroplasties and 284 (93%) of the revision hip arthroplasties at 8-11 years after surgery. Patients were traced by postal questionnaire, telephone interview or examination of case notes of the deceased.

Results: The dislocation rates by approach were 23 out of 555 (4.1%) for the posterior approach, 0 out of 120 (0%) for the Omega approach and 30 out of 892 (3.4%) for the modified Hardinge approach. Of dislocations after primary total hip arthroplasty, 58.5% were recurrent. The mean number of dislocations per patient was 2.81. Overall, 8.1% of revision total hip arthroplasties dislocated. 70% of these became recurrent. The mean number of dislocations per patient was 2.87. The vast majority of dislocations occurred within 2 months of surgery.

Discussion: To our knowledge, this is the largest multisurgeon audit of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty published in the UK. The follow-up of 8-11 years is longer than most comparable studies. The results of this study can be used to inform patients as to the risk and outcome of dislocation, as well as to the risk of further dislocation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Time to first dislocation in those patients who had undergone primary hip replacement.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Time interval between first and second dislocation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Time to first dislocation in those patients who underwent revision hip arthroplasty.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Interval between first and second dislocation in those patients suffering recurrent dislocation following revision hip replacement.

References

    1. Charnley J. The long-term results of low–friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1972;54:61–76. - PubMed
    1. Eftekhar NS. Dislocation and instability complicating low friction arthroplasty of the hip joint. Clin Orthop. 1976;121:120–5. - PubMed
    1. Ritter MA. Dislocation and subluxation of the total hip replacement. Clin Orthop. 1976;121:92–4. - PubMed
    1. Robinson RP, Robinson HJ, Salvati EA. Comparison of the transtrochanteric and posterior approaches for total hip replacement. Clin Orthop. 1980;147:142–7. - PubMed
    1. Fackler CD, Poss R. Dislocation in total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop. 1980;151:169–78. - PubMed