Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Sep 16;9 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S21.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-S2-S21.

Tumor classification ranking from microarray data

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Tumor classification ranking from microarray data

Rattikorn Hewett et al. BMC Genomics. .

Abstract

Background: Gene expression profiles based on microarray data are recognized as potential diagnostic indices of cancer. Molecular tumor classifications resulted from these data and learning algorithms have advanced our understanding of genetic changes associated with cancer etiology and development. However, classifications are not always perfect and in such cases the classification rankings (likelihoods of correct class predictions) can be useful for directing further research (e.g., by deriving inferences about predictive indicators or prioritizing future experiments). Classification ranking is a challenging problem, particularly for microarray data, where there is a huge number of possible regulated genes with no known rating function. This study investigates the possibility of making tumor classification more informative by using a method for classification ranking that requires no additional ranking analysis and maintains relatively good classification accuracy.

Results: Microarray data of 11 different types and subtypes of cancer were analyzed using MDR (Multi-Dimensional Ranker), a recently developed boosting-based ranking algorithm. The number of predictor genes in all of the resulting classification models was at most nine, a huge reduction from the more than 12 thousands genes in the majority of the expression samples. Compared to several other learning algorithms, MDR gives the greatest AUC (area under the ROC curve) for the classifications of prostate cancer, acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and four ALL subtypes: BCR-ABL, E2A-PBX1, MALL and TALL. SVM (Support Vector Machine) gives the highest AUC for the classifications of lung, lymphoma, and breast cancers, and two ALL subtypes: Hyperdiploid > 50 and TEL-AML1. MDR gives highly competitive results, producing the highest average AUC, 91.01%, and an average overall accuracy of 90.01% for cancer expression analysis.

Conclusion: Using the classification rankings from MDR is a simple technique for obtaining effective and informative tumor classifications from cancer gene expression data. Further interpretation of the results obtained from MDR is required. MDR can also be used directly as a simple feature selection mechanism to identify genes relevant to tumor classification. MDR may be applicable to many other classification problems for microarray data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ROC curves on prostate cancer expressions
Figure 2
Figure 2
Basic steps of MDR
Figure 3
Figure 3
Example of a model produced by MDR
Figure 4
Figure 4
Performance metrics in binary classification
Figure 5
Figure 5
ROC curves on breast cancer classification of the same accuracy

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alizadeh AA, Eisen MB, Davis RE, Ma C, Lossos IS, Rosenwald A, Boldrick JC, Sabet H, Tran T, Yu X, Powell JI, Yang L, Marti GE, Moore T, Hudson J, Lu L, Lewis DB, Tibshirani R, Sherlock G, Chan WC, Greiner TC, Weisenburger DD, Armitage JO, Warnke R, Levy R, Wilson W, Grever MR, Byrd JC, Botstein D, Brown PO, Staudt LM. Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling. Nature. 2000;403:503–511. doi: 10.1038/35000501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35000501 - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burges CJC, Schölkopf B. Improving the Accuracy and Speed of Support Vector Machines. In: Mozer MC, Jordan MI, Petsche T, editor. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Vol. 9. The MIT Press; 1997. p. 375.http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/burges97improving.html
    1. Gordon GJ, Jensen RV, Hsiao LL, Gullans SR, Blumenstock JE, Ramaswamy S, Richards WG, Sugarbaker DJ, Bueno R. Translation of Microarray Data into Clinically Relevant Cancer Diagnostic Tests Using Gene Expression Ratios in Lung Cancer and Mesothelioma. Cancer Res. 2002;62:4963–4967. http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/62/17/4963 - PubMed
    1. Li J, Liu H, Ng SK, Wong L. Discovery of significant rules for classifying cancer diagnosis data. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:ii93–102. http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/19/suppl_2... - PubMed
    1. Singh D, Febbo PG, Ross K, Jackson DG, Manola J, Ladd C, Tamayo P, Renshaw AA, D'Amico AV, Richie JP, Lander ES, Loda M, Kantoff PW, Golub TR, Sellers WR. Gene expression correlates of clinical prostate cancer behavior. Cancer cell. 2002;1:203–9. doi: 10.1016/S1535-6108(02)00030-2. [PMID: 12086878]. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources