Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Oct 17;29(4):615-27.
doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.07.016. Epub 2008 Oct 2.

Fas receptor expression in germinal-center B cells is essential for T and B lymphocyte homeostasis

Affiliations

Fas receptor expression in germinal-center B cells is essential for T and B lymphocyte homeostasis

Zhenyue Hao et al. Immunity. .

Abstract

Fas is highly expressed in activated and germinal center (GC) B cells but can potentially be inactivated by misguided somatic hypermutation. We employed conditional Fas-deficient mice to investigate the physiological functions of Fas in various B cell subsets. B cell-specific Fas-deficient mice developed fatal lymphoproliferation due to activation of B cells and T cells. Ablation of Fas specifically in GC B cells reproduced the phenotype, indicating that the lymphoproliferation initiates in the GC environment. B cell-specific Fas-deficient mice also showed an accumulation of IgG1(+) memory B cells expressing high amounts of CD80 and the expansion of CD28-expressing CD4(+) Th cells. Blocking T cell-B cell interaction and GC formation completely prevented the fatal lymphoproliferation. Thus, Fas-mediated selection of GC B cells and the resulting memory B cell compartment is essential for maintaining the homeostasis of both T and B lymphocytes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Fasfl/flCd19-Cre Mice Die Prematurely Because of Lymphocyte Infiltration in Multiple Organs
(A) Confirmation of Fas deletion. The left side shows a representative Southern blot of naive FASFL/fl and Fasfl/flCd19-Cre B cells showing deletion of the Fas gene in 83% of the latter (87.3% ± 4%, n = 4). The right side shows a representative flow-cytometric analysis of Fasfl/+Cd19-Cre and Fasfl/flCd19-Cre B cells (stimulated for 2–4 days with LPS) showing that Fas protein expression was lacking in 81% of the mutant cells (85.4% ± 4.8%, n = 4). (B) Reduced life span. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of Fasfl/flCd19-Cre mice compared to controls. (C) Organ infiltration. Focal interstitial lymphocyte accumulation is shown in H&E-stained sections of livers, lungs, and kidneys of Fasfl/fl and Fasfl/flCd19-Cre mice at the ages of 6 and 14 months. Scale bars apply to all panels in a row.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Hyperproliferation and Activation of T and B Cells and Disrupted Lymphoid-Organ Architecture in Fasfl/flCd19-Cre Mice
(A) Increased cell numbers. Absolute numbers of total lymphocytes, B cells, and T cells in spleens of Fasfl/fl and Fasfl/flCd19-Cre mice at age 6–7 months (n = 3/genotype). For all figures, *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.005. (B) Altered surface marker expression. CD4+ T cells, total T cells, and total B cells from Fasfl/fl and Fasfl/flCd19-Cre mice at the ages of 2, 6, or 14 months were examined by flow cytometry for expression of CD28, ICOS, ICOSL, and MHCII as indicated. (C) Increased proliferation. BrdU incorporation by B220+IgM+B cells and CD4+ and CD8+ T cells was measured by flow cytometry. The percentage of BrdU+ cells is indicated. (D and E) Sections of spleen (D) and LN (E) from 14-month-old Fasfl/fl and Fasfl/flCd19-Cre mice were stained with H&E (top and middle) or with immunohistochemical staining for detection of T and B cells (bottom). T cells that were stained positively with anti-CD3 were dark blue in color, whereas B cells that were stained positively with B220 antibody were brown. Scale bars apply to control and mutant samples in a pair.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Increased Cytokine Production in Fasfl/flCd19-Cre Mice
(A) Elevated serum cytokines. Serum amounts of IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-10, and IL-6 were determined in Fasfl/fl and Fasfl/flCd19-Cre mice of age ≥ 11 months. Results shown represent the mean cytokine level ± SD (n = 4–6 mice/genotype). (B) Increased numbers of cytokine-producing cells. Cells from LNs of aged Fasfl/fl and Fasfl/flCd19-Cre mice were fixed with 1.6% PFA, subjected to intracellular staining with antibodies recognizing the indicated cytokine, and analyzed by flow cytometry. Numbers are the percentage of cells in the gated lymphocyte population that produced the indicated cytokine (n = 3–4).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Ablation of Fas in GC B Cells Reproduces the Lymphoproliferative Disorder in Fasfl/flCd19-Cre Mice
(A) Confirmation of Fas deletion in GC B cells. The top portion shows flow-cytometric analysis of GC B cells (PNAhiCD38lo) among gated CD19+ B cells of Fasfl/lpr and Fasfl/lprIghg1-Cre mice. Numbers are the percentage of GC B cells among total B cells. The bottom-right portion shows the absence of Fas expression in GC B cells from mLN of Fasfl/lprIghg1-Cre mice. The bottom-left portion shows a Southern blot of T cells (T), follicular B cells (FB), and marginal zone B cells (MZ) from Fasfl/+Ighg1-Cre mice confirming the absence of Cre-mediated recombination in cells other than GC B cells. (B) Increased weight of spleens from 3.5- and 8-month-old Fasfl/lpr and Fasfl/lprIghg1-Cre mice. Each symbol represents an individual mouse. (C) Increased absolute numbers of total lymphocytes and B and T cells in spleens of 8-month-old Fasfl/lpr and Fasfl/lprIghg1-Cre mice. Results shown represent the mean ± SD (n = 3/genotype). (D) Disrupted splenic architecture. We stained spleen sections from 8-month-old Fasfl/lpr (left) and Fasfl/lprIghg1-Cre (right) mice with H&E to reveal the splenic architecture. Scale bars apply to control and mutant samples in a pair. (E) Accumulation of GC B cells. Representative flow-cytometric analyses of GC B cells (PNAhiCD38lo) within gated B cells in spleen (SP) and mLN of 3- to 3.5-month-old Fasfl/lpr and Fasfl/lpr Ighg1-Cre mice before (no imm) and 30 days after immunization with SRBC. (F) Accumulation of GC B cells in Fasfl/flCd19-Cre mice. Representative flow cytometric analyses of GC B cells among B220+ B cells in spleen (SP) and mLN of unimmunized Fasfl/fl and Fasfl/flCd19-Cre mice. Numbers in (F) and (G) are the percentage of GC B cells (PNAhiCD38lo) among gated B cells.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Hyperproliferation and Activation of Fas-Deficient B Cells Is T Cell Dependent
Fasfl/flCd19-CreTcrb−/− mice lack T cells and have Fas-deficient B cells. B cells from Fasfl/fl, Fasfl/flCd19-Cre, and Fasfl/flCd19-CreTcrb−/− mice were examined for (A) MHC class II expression as in Figure 2B; (B) BrdU incorporation as in Figure 2C; and (C) B cell cellularity in the LN as in Figure 2A. The mean cellularity ± SD is shown (n = 3–9 mice/genotype). (D) H&E stained sections of spleen and liver from mice of the indicated genotypes. Scale bars apply to an entire row.
Figure 6
Figure 6. The Lymphoproliferative Disorder in Fasfl/flCd19-Cre Mice Is Caused by Memory B Cells and Requires CD28-CD80 Signaling
Fasfl/flCd19-CreCd28−/− mice lack CD28 in all cells and Fas in B cells only. Fasfl/fl, Fasfl/flCd19-Cre, and Fasfl/flCd19-CreCd28−/− mice were examined for (A) percentage of B220+IgMIgD B cells. Mean numbers ± SD of B220+IgMIgD B cells in spleens of Fasfl/fl, Fasfl/flCd19-Cre, and Fasfl/flCd19-CreCd28−/− mice (n = 3–4/genotype) were 7.6 ± 1.78 × 105, 37.8 ± 5.1 × 105 and 4.8 ± 0.96 × 105, respectively. Fasfl/fl, Fasfl/flCd19-Cre, and Fasfl/flCd19-CreCd28−/− mice were examined for (B) percentage of B220+IgG1+ memory B cells (top) and CD80 and CD86 expression (bottom). Mean numbers ± SD of B220+IgG1+ memory B cells in spleens of Fasfl/fl, Fasfl/flCd19-Cre and Fasfl/flCd19-CreCd28−/− mice (n = 3–4/genotype) were 2.9 ± 1.3 × 104, 85.2 ± 58.6 × 104 and 1.73 ± 1.17 × 104, respectively. (C) shows the expression of the indicated markers on T and B cells as in Figure 2B; (D) shows STAT1 phosphorylation in IFN-γ-stimulated T cells as in Figure S4B; (E) shows BrdU incorporation as in Figure 2C; and (F) shows LN cellularity (right) as in Figure 2A; the mean cellularity ± SD is shown (n = 3–7 mice/genotype). *(*)p < 0.05 for Fasfl/fl versus Fasfl/flCd19-Cre mice but p < 0.005 for Fasfl/flCd19-Cre versus Fasfl/flCd19-CreCd28−/− mice. Mice were ≥11 months old (A, B, C, E, and F) or 5 to 6 months old (D).

References

    1. Barreiro R, Luker G, Herndon J, Ferguson TA. Termination of antigen-specific immunity by CD95 ligand (Fas ligand) and IL-10. J. Immunol. 2004;173:1519–1525. - PubMed
    1. Carreno BM, Collins M. The B7 family of ligands and its receptors: New pathways for costimulation and inhibition of immune responses. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2002;20:29–53. - PubMed
    1. Casola S, Cattoretti G, Uyttersprot N, Koralov SB, Segal J, Hao Z, Waisman A, Egert A, Ghitza D, Rajewsky K. Tracking germinal center B cells expressing germ-line immunoglobulin gamma1 transcripts by conditional gene targeting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:7396–7401. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cohen PL, Eisenberg RA. Lpr and gld: Single gene models of systemic autoimmunity and lymphoproliferative disease. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1991;9:243–269. - PubMed
    1. Ferguson SE, Han S, Kelsoe G, Thompson CB. CD28 is required for germinal center formation. J. Immunol. 1996;156:4576–4581. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms