Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Dec;29(8):1050-5.
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181859a08.

Accuracy of image-guided surgical systems at the lateral skull base as clinically assessed using bone-anchored hearing aid posts as surgical targets

Affiliations

Accuracy of image-guided surgical systems at the lateral skull base as clinically assessed using bone-anchored hearing aid posts as surgical targets

Ramya Balachandran et al. Otol Neurotol. 2008 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: Image-guided surgical (IGS) technology has been clinically available for more than a decade. To date, no acceptable standard exists for reporting the accuracy of IGS systems, especially for lateral skull base applications. We present a validation method that uses the post from bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) patients as a target. We then compare the accuracy of 2 IGS systems-one using laser skin-surface scanning (LSSS) and another using a noninvasive fiducial frame (FF) attached to patient via dental bite-block (DBB) for registration.

Study design: Prospective.

Setting: Tertiary referral center.

Patients: Six BAHA patients who had adequate dentition for creation of a DBB.

Intervention(s): For each patient, a dental impression was obtained, and a customized DBB was made to hold an FF. Temporal bone computed tomographic (CT) scans were obtained with the patient wearing the DBB, FF, and a customized marker on the BAHA post. In a mock operating room, CT scans were registered to operative anatomy using 2 methods: 1) LSSS and 2) FF.

Main outcome measure(s): For each patient and each system, the position of the BAHA marker in the CT scan and in the mock operating room (using optical measurement technology) was compared, and the distances between them are reported to demonstrate accuracy.

Results: Accuracy (mean +/- standard deviation) was 1.54 +/- 0.63 mm for DBB registration and 3.21 +/- 1.02 mm for LSSS registration.

Conclusion: An IGS system using FF registration is more accurate than one using LSSS (p = 0.03, 2-sided Student's t test). BAHA patients provide a unique patient population upon which IGS systems may be validated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Surgical target. (a) Customized post with the ball affixed, (b) The post attached on to the BAHA abutment, (c) Hollow-tube probe tip used to localize the center of the ball.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patient wearing the fiducial frame and customized surgical target (not visible in this figure) just before the CT scan.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Headband CRF attached to the patient for the physical data localization with the BrainLab system.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Physical localization of the target marker at the BAHA with respect to the coordinate reference system (CRF).

References

    1. Fried MP, Kleefield J, Gopal H, et al. Image-guided endoscopic surgery: results of accuracy and performance in a multi-center clinical study using an electromagnetic tracking system. Laryngoscope. 1997;107:594–601. - PubMed
    1. Casiano RR, Numa WA. Efficacy of computed tomography image-guided endoscopic sinus surgery in residency training programs. Laryngoscope. 2000;110:1277–1282. - PubMed
    1. Weinberg JS, Lang FF, Sawaya R. Surgical management of brain metastases. Curr Oncol Rep. 2001;3(6):476–83. - PubMed
    1. Wisoff JH, Boyett JM, Berger MS, et al. Current neurosurgical management and the impact of the extent of resection in the treatment of malignant gliomas of childhood: a report of the Children's Cancer Group trial no. CCG-945. J of Neurosurg. 1998;89(1):52–9. - PubMed
    1. Cleary K, Kinsella A. OR 2020: the operating room of the future. J Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. 2005;15(5):495, 497–573. Part A. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms