Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Oct;16(5):405-16.
doi: 10.1037/a0013628.

Opioids and the treatment of chronic pain: controversies, current status, and future directions

Affiliations
Review

Opioids and the treatment of chronic pain: controversies, current status, and future directions

Andrew Rosenblum et al. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Oct.

Abstract

Opioids have been regarded for millennia as among the most effective drugs for the treatment of pain. Their use in the management of acute severe pain and chronic pain related to advanced medical illness is considered the standard of care in most of the world. In contrast, the long-term administration of an opioid for the treatment of chronic noncancer pain continues to be controversial. Concerns related to effectiveness, safety, and abuse liability have evolved over decades, sometimes driving a more restrictive perspective and sometimes leading to a greater willingness to endorse this treatment. The past several decades in the United States have been characterized by attitudes that have shifted repeatedly in response to clinical and epidemiological observations, and events in the legal and regulatory communities. The interface between the legitimate medical use of opioids to provide analgesia and the phenomena associated with abuse and addiction continues to challenge the clinical community, leading to uncertainty about the appropriate role of these drugs in the treatment of pain. This narrative review briefly describes the neurobiology of opioids and then focuses on the complex issues at this interface between analgesia and abuse, including terminology, clinical challenges, and the potential for new agents, such as buprenorphine, to influence practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. AAPM, APS et al. The use of opioids for the treatment of chronic pain. A consensus statement from the American Academy of Pain Medicine and the American Pain Society. Clinical Journal of Pain. 1997;13:6–8. - PubMed
    1. Adriaensen H, Mattelaer B, Vanmeenen H. A long-term open, clinical and pharmacokinetic assessment of subligngual buprenorphine in patients suffering from chronic pain. Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica. 1985;36:33–40. - PubMed
    1. American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) Promoting Pain Relief and Preventing Abuse of Pain Medications: A Critical Balancing Act. A Joint Statement From 21 Health Organizations and the Drug Enforcement Administration. 1996–2002. Retieved on February 25 from http://www.ampainsoc.org/advocacy/promoting.htm. - PubMed
    1. American Geriatric Society. The management of chronic pain in older persons. American Geriatric Society Panel on Chronic Pain in Older Persons. Geriatrics. 1998;53:s8–s24. - PubMed
    1. American Pain Society (APS) Chronic pain in America: roadblocks to relief. 1999. Retrieved February 12, 2008, from http://www.ampainsoc.org/links/roadblocks/

MeSH terms