Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: perioperative outcomes of 1500 cases
- PMID: 18837657
- DOI: 10.1089/end.2008.9711
Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: perioperative outcomes of 1500 cases
Abstract
Background: Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) is an evolving minimally invasive treatment of for localized prostate cancer. We present our experience of 1500 consecutive cases with an analysis of perioperative outcomes.
Patients and methods: Fifteen hundred consecutive RALPs were performed by a single surgeon (VRP). Following Institutional Review Board approval, clinical coordinators performed prospective intraoperative and postoperative data collection. Functional outcomes were assessed using validated self-administered questionnaires.
Results: Mean OR time from skin incision to fascial closure (the time that the surgeon was present) was 105 minutes (55-300). Mean EBL was 111 cc (50-500). Ninety-seven percent of patients were discharged home on postoperative day 1. The overall complication rate was 4.3% with no mortalities. The positive margin rate (PMR) was 9.3% overall. PMR was 4% for pT2, 34% for T3 and 40% for pathologic stage T4.
Conclusions: Our initial series represents one of the largest published series for perioperative outcomes of robotic assisted prostatectomy. Our data demonstrates the feasibility, safety and efficacy of the procedure.
Similar articles
-
Outcomes of locally advanced (T3 or greater) prostate cancer in men undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.J Endourol. 2009 Sep;23(9):1519-22. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0388. J Endourol. 2009. PMID: 19694528 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparisons of the perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes after robot-assisted versus pure extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.Eur Urol. 2014 Mar;65(3):610-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.11.049. Epub 2012 Dec 1. Eur Urol. 2014. PMID: 23245815
-
Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up.Eur Urol. 2009 Jun;55(6):1358-66. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.12.035. Epub 2009 Jan 9. Eur Urol. 2009. PMID: 19147274
-
Current status of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: how does it compare with other surgical approaches?Int J Urol. 2013 Mar;20(3):271-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03193.x. Epub 2012 Oct 29. Int J Urol. 2013. PMID: 23106163 Review.
-
Perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes after open and minimally invasive prostate cancer surgery: experience from Australasia.BJU Int. 2011 Apr;107 Suppl 3:11-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10053.x. BJU Int. 2011. PMID: 21492370 Review.
Cited by
-
Does robotic prostatectomy meet its promise in the management of prostate cancer?Curr Urol Rep. 2013 Jun;14(3):184-91. doi: 10.1007/s11934-013-0327-8. Curr Urol Rep. 2013. PMID: 23564268 Review.
-
Preventing perioperative complications of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.Urology. 2013 Feb;81(2):319-23. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.09.033. Urology. 2013. PMID: 23374792 Free PMC article.
-
Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers.J Endourol. 2010 Dec;24(12):2003-15. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0295. Epub 2010 Oct 13. J Endourol. 2010. PMID: 20942686 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Oncological and functional results of open intrafascial radical prostatectomy].Urologe A. 2011 Sep;50(9):1106-9. doi: 10.1007/s00120-011-2635-2. Urologe A. 2011. PMID: 21735267 German.
-
The surgical learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience of a single surgeon with 500 cases in Taiwan, China.Asian J Androl. 2014 Sep-Oct;16(5):728-34. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.128515. Asian J Androl. 2014. PMID: 24830691 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources