Propofol-fentanyl versus propofol alone for lumbar puncture sedation in children with acute hematologic malignancies: propofol dosing and adverse events
- PMID: 18838923
- PMCID: PMC3076743
- DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31818e3ad3
Propofol-fentanyl versus propofol alone for lumbar puncture sedation in children with acute hematologic malignancies: propofol dosing and adverse events
Abstract
Objective: We sought to determine whether the combination of propofol and fentanyl results in lower propofol doses and fewer adverse cardiopulmonary events than propofol and placebo for lumbar puncture in children with acute hematologic malignancies.
Design: Randomized, controlled, double blind, crossover study.
Setting: Pediatric Sedation Program.
Patients: Children with acute leukemia or lymphoma receiving sedation for lumbar puncture.
Interventions: Each patient received two sedations in random order, one with propofol/placebo and one with propofol/fentanyl. The study investigator and patient/parent were blinded to placebo or fentanyl. Data collected included patient age and diagnosis, propofol dose and adverse events. Adverse events included oxygen saturation <94%, airway obstruction, apnea, hypotension, and bradycardia (<5% mean for age). Logistic regression analysis was used to assess probability of adverse events and the Wilcoxon Signed Rank and McNemar's tests were used for paired comparisons.
Measurements and main results: Twenty-two patients were enrolled. Fourteen patients were male and eight were female. Each patient was studied twice for a total of 44 sedations. The median age was 5.0 yrs (range, 2.2-17.2 yrs). All procedures were successfully completed. The median total dose of propofol was 5.05 mg/kg (range, 2.4-10.2 mg/kg) for propofol/placebo vs. 3.00 mg/kg (range 1.4-10.5 mg/kg) for propofol/fentanyl (p < 0.001). Twelve adverse events occurred in 11 of 22 patients (50.0%) propofol/placebo compared with 6 of 22 (18.2%) propofol/fentanyl (p = 0.02). The most common adverse event was hypotension.
Conclusions: The combination of propofol and fentanyl vs. propofol alone for lumbar puncture sedation in children with acute hematologic malignancies resulted in lower propofol doses and fewer adverse events.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no other financial disclosures or conflict of interest declarations.
Figures


References
-
- Pui CH, Mahmoud HH, Rivera GK, et al. Early intensification of intrathecal chemotherapy virtually eliminates central nervous system relapse in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 1998;92:441–415. - PubMed
-
- Katz ER, Kellerman J, Siegel SE. Behavioral distress in children with cancer undergoing medical procedures: Developmental considerations. J Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1980;48(1):356–365. - PubMed
-
- McGrath PJ, Hsu E, Cappelli M, et al. Pain from pediatric cancer: A survey of an\outpatient oncology clinic. J Psychosocial Oncology. 1990;8(2/3):109–124.
-
- Ellis JA, Spanos NP. Cognitive-behavioral interventions for children’s distress during bone marrow aspirations and lumbar punctures: A critical review. J Pain and Symptom Management. 1994;9(2):96–108. - PubMed
-
- Kazak AE, Penati B, Waibel MK, et al. The perception of procedures questionnaire: Psychometric properties of a brief parent report measure of procedural distress. J Pediatr Psychology. 1996;21(2):195–207. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources