Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2008 Nov;9(6):616-22.
doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31818e3ad3.

Propofol-fentanyl versus propofol alone for lumbar puncture sedation in children with acute hematologic malignancies: propofol dosing and adverse events

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Propofol-fentanyl versus propofol alone for lumbar puncture sedation in children with acute hematologic malignancies: propofol dosing and adverse events

Gregory A Hollman et al. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: We sought to determine whether the combination of propofol and fentanyl results in lower propofol doses and fewer adverse cardiopulmonary events than propofol and placebo for lumbar puncture in children with acute hematologic malignancies.

Design: Randomized, controlled, double blind, crossover study.

Setting: Pediatric Sedation Program.

Patients: Children with acute leukemia or lymphoma receiving sedation for lumbar puncture.

Interventions: Each patient received two sedations in random order, one with propofol/placebo and one with propofol/fentanyl. The study investigator and patient/parent were blinded to placebo or fentanyl. Data collected included patient age and diagnosis, propofol dose and adverse events. Adverse events included oxygen saturation <94%, airway obstruction, apnea, hypotension, and bradycardia (<5% mean for age). Logistic regression analysis was used to assess probability of adverse events and the Wilcoxon Signed Rank and McNemar's tests were used for paired comparisons.

Measurements and main results: Twenty-two patients were enrolled. Fourteen patients were male and eight were female. Each patient was studied twice for a total of 44 sedations. The median age was 5.0 yrs (range, 2.2-17.2 yrs). All procedures were successfully completed. The median total dose of propofol was 5.05 mg/kg (range, 2.4-10.2 mg/kg) for propofol/placebo vs. 3.00 mg/kg (range 1.4-10.5 mg/kg) for propofol/fentanyl (p < 0.001). Twelve adverse events occurred in 11 of 22 patients (50.0%) propofol/placebo compared with 6 of 22 (18.2%) propofol/fentanyl (p = 0.02). The most common adverse event was hypotension.

Conclusions: The combination of propofol and fentanyl vs. propofol alone for lumbar puncture sedation in children with acute hematologic malignancies resulted in lower propofol doses and fewer adverse events.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no other financial disclosures or conflict of interest declarations.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The sedation period was divided into 3 stages: pre-procedure stage, procedure stage and post procedure stage. (1) Pre-procedure stage: fentanyl or placebo administration. (2) Procedure stage: propofol induction, propofol titration during the procedure and performance of the LP. (3) Post procedure stage: recovery period and discharge.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Propofol doses for each group, administered for induction, the procedure and for the entire sedation (total) P/P: Propofol/Placebo group P/F: Propofol/Fentanyl group Box plot: Box = 75–25 percentile; bold line=median values; black dot=mean values; whiskers correspond to median +/− 1.5 times the interquartile range; dot=values beyond median +/− 1.5 times the interquartile range (outliers)

References

    1. Pui CH, Mahmoud HH, Rivera GK, et al. Early intensification of intrathecal chemotherapy virtually eliminates central nervous system relapse in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 1998;92:441–415. - PubMed
    1. Katz ER, Kellerman J, Siegel SE. Behavioral distress in children with cancer undergoing medical procedures: Developmental considerations. J Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1980;48(1):356–365. - PubMed
    1. McGrath PJ, Hsu E, Cappelli M, et al. Pain from pediatric cancer: A survey of an\outpatient oncology clinic. J Psychosocial Oncology. 1990;8(2/3):109–124.
    1. Ellis JA, Spanos NP. Cognitive-behavioral interventions for children’s distress during bone marrow aspirations and lumbar punctures: A critical review. J Pain and Symptom Management. 1994;9(2):96–108. - PubMed
    1. Kazak AE, Penati B, Waibel MK, et al. The perception of procedures questionnaire: Psychometric properties of a brief parent report measure of procedural distress. J Pediatr Psychology. 1996;21(2):195–207. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms