Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008:635:135-46.
doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-09550-9_11.

The damage-response framework of microbial pathogenesis and infectious diseases

Affiliations
Review

The damage-response framework of microbial pathogenesis and infectious diseases

Liise-anne Pirofski et al. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2008.

Abstract

Historical and most currently held views of microbial pathogenesis and virulence are plagued by confusing and imprecise terminology and definitions that require revision and exceptions to accommodate new basic science and clinical information about microbes and infectious diseases. These views are also inherently unable to account for the ability of some microbes to cause disease in certain, but not other hosts, because they are grounded in singular, either microbe-or host-centric views. The damage-response framework is an integrated theory of microbial pathogenesis that puts forth the view that microbial pathogenesis reflects the outcome of an interaction between a host and a microbe, with each entity contributing to the nature of the outcome, which in turn depends on the amount of host damage that results from the host-microbe interaction. This view is able to accommodate new information and explain why infection with the same microbe can have different outcomes in different hosts. This chapter describes the origins and conceptual underpinnings of and the outcomes of infection put forth in, the damage-response framework.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Casadevall A., Pirofski L. Host-pathogen interactions: redefining the basic concepts of virulence and pathogenicity. Infect Immun. 1999;67:3703–13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Casadevall A., Pirofski L. The damage-response framework of microbial pathogenesis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2003;1:17–24. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro732. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pirofski L., Casadevall A. The meaning of microbial exposure, infection, colonisation and disease in clinical practice. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002;2(10):628–35. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(02)00398-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rangel-Frausto M.S., Wiblin T., Blumberg H.M., et al. National epidemiology of mycoses survey (NEMIS): variations in rates of bloodstream infections due to Candida species in seven surgical intensive care units and six neonatal intensive care units. Clin Infect Dis. 1999;29:253–8. doi: 10.1086/520194. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blumberg H.M., Jarvis W.R., Soucie J.M., et al. Risk factors for candidal bloodstream infections in surgical intensive care unit patients: the NEMIS prospective multicenter study. The National Epidemiology of Mycosis Survey. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33(2):177–86. doi: 10.1086/321811. - DOI - PubMed