The association of glycemic load and carbohydrate intake with colorectal cancer risk in the Multiethnic Cohort Study
- PMID: 18842796
- PMCID: PMC4482108
- DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/88.4.1074
The association of glycemic load and carbohydrate intake with colorectal cancer risk in the Multiethnic Cohort Study
Abstract
Background: High-glycemic-load diets may increase colorectal cancer risk through hyperinsulinemic effects.
Objective: We analyzed data for 191,004 participants in the Multiethnic Cohort Study to determine the risk of colorectal cancer associated with glycemic load (GL), carbohydrate, and sucrose and to ascertain whether this risk was modified by sex and ethnicity.
Design: During 8 y of follow-up, 2379 incident cases of colorectal adenocarcinoma occurred. We used baseline quantitative food-frequency questionnaire data to assess usual dietary intake over the preceding year. Using Cox regression, we calculated adjusted relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs for colorectal cancer associated with quintiles of GL, carbohydrate, and sucrose.
Results: For both men and women in this cohort, white rice was the major contributor to GL. In multivariate models, RRs for colorectal cancer decreased significantly with increasing GL in women (RR for the highest quintile versus the lowest: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.57, 0.97; P for trend = 0.02) but not in men (RR: 1.15; 95% CI: 0.89, 1.48; P for trend = 0.19). Results for carbohydrate and sucrose were similar. The inverse association with GL was found in women of all ethnic groups (P for interaction = 0.58). In men, an interaction was found between ethnicity and GL (P < 0.01): white men had a positive association with increasing GL (RR: 1.69; 95% CI: 0.98, 2.92; P for trend < 0.01), but men of other ethnic groups did not.
Conclusion: GL and carbohydrate intake appear to protect against colorectal cancer in women in the Multiethnic Cohort, perhaps because a major source of GL is white rice.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors'uo; responsibilities were as follows—NCH, SPM, and LNK: the study concept and design; LNK, LRW, and BEH: data collection; NCH and LRW: statistical analysis; NCH, SPM, and LNK: interpretation of results; NCH: writing the manuscript; and all authors: critical review and approval of the final manuscript. None of the authors had a financial or personal conflict of interest.
References
-
- Potter JD. Colon cancer: review of the epidemiology. Epidemiol Rev. 1993;15:499–545. - PubMed
-
- World Cancer Research Fund. Food, nutrition and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. Washington, DC: American Institute for Cancer Research; 1997. - PubMed
-
- McKeown-Eyssen GE. Epidemiology of colorectal cancer revisited: are serum triglycerides and/or plasma glucose associated with risk? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1994;3:687–95. - PubMed
-
- Giovannucci E. Insulin and colon cancer. Cancer Causes Control. 1995;6:164–79. - PubMed
-
- Giovannucci E. Insulin, insulin-like growth factors and colon cancer: a review of the evidence. J Nutr. 2001;131(suppl):3109S–20S. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
