Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2008 Oct 8;2008(4):CD001552.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001552.pub2.

Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome

Renato J Verdugo  1 , Rodrigo A Salinas, José L Castillo, José G Cea
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome

Renato J Verdugo et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Update in

Abstract

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome results from entrapment of the median nerve in the wrist. Common symptoms are tingling, numbness, and pain in the hand that may radiate to the forearm or shoulder. Most symptomatic cases are treated non-surgically.

Objectives: The objective is to compare the efficacy of surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome with non-surgical treatment.

Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Trials Register (January 2008), MEDLINE (January 1966 to January 2008), EMBASE (January 1980 to January 2008) and LILACS (January 1982 to January 2008). We checked bibliographies in papers and contacted authors for information about other published or unpublished studies.

Selection criteria: We included all randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing any surgical and any non-surgical therapies.

Data collection and analysis: Two authors independently assessed the eligibility of the trials.

Main results: In this update we found four randomised controlled trials involving 317 participants in total. Three of them including 295 participants, 148 allocated to surgery and 147 to non-surgical treatment reported information on our primary outcome (improvement at three months of follow-up). The pooled estimate favoured surgery (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.46). Two trials including 245 participants described outcome at six month follow-up, also favouring surgery (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.39).Two trials reported clinical improvement at one year follow-up. They included 198 patients favouring surgery (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.53). The only trial describing changes in neurophysiological parameters in both groups also favoured surgery (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.97). Two trials described need for surgery during follow-up, including 198 patients. The pooled estimate for this outcome indicates that a significant proportion of people treated medically will require surgery while the risk of re-operation in surgically treated people is low (RR 0.04 favouring surgery, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.17). Complications of surgery and medical treatment were described by two trials with 226 participants. Although the incidence of complications was high in both groups, they were significantly more common in the surgical arm (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.76).

Authors' conclusions: Surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome relieves symptoms significantly better than splinting. Further research is needed to discover whether this conclusion applies to people with mild symptoms and whether surgical treatment is better than steroid injection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Surgical versus non‐surgical treatment ‐ primary outcomes, Outcome 1 Improvement in clinical symptoms at three months.
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Surgical versus non‐surgical treatment ‐ primary outcomes, Outcome 2 Improvement in clinical symptoms at six months.
2.1
2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2 Surgical versus non‐surgical treatment ‐ secondary outcomes, Outcome 1 Clinical improvement at one year of follow‐up.
2.2
2.2. Analysis
Comparison 2 Surgical versus non‐surgical treatment ‐ secondary outcomes, Outcome 2 Clinical improvement without including its relevance.
2.3
2.3. Analysis
Comparison 2 Surgical versus non‐surgical treatment ‐ secondary outcomes, Outcome 3 Need for surgery or secondary surgery during follow‐up.
2.4
2.4. Analysis
Comparison 2 Surgical versus non‐surgical treatment ‐ secondary outcomes, Outcome 4 Clinical improvement at less than three months.
2.5
2.5. Analysis
Comparison 2 Surgical versus non‐surgical treatment ‐ secondary outcomes, Outcome 5 Complications of surgery and medical treatment.
2.6
2.6. Analysis
Comparison 2 Surgical versus non‐surgical treatment ‐ secondary outcomes, Outcome 6 Improvement in neurophysiological parameters.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

References to studies included in this review

Garland 1964 {published data only}
    1. Garland H, Langworth EP, Taverner D, Clark JMP. Surgical treatment for the carpal tunnel syndrome. Lancet 1964;I(7343):1129‐30. - PubMed
Gerritsen 2002 {published data only}
    1. Gerritsen AAM, Vet HCW, Scholten RJPM, Bertelsmann FW, Krom MCTFM, Bouter LM. Splinting versus surgery in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. A randomized controlled trial. Jounal of the American Medical Association 2002;288(10):1245‐51. - PubMed
Hui 2005 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Hui AC, Wong S, Leung CH, Tong P, Mok V, Poon D, et al. A randomized controlled trial of surgery versus steroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome. Neurology 2005;64(12):2074‐8. [PMID: 15985575] - PubMed
Ly Pen 2005 {published data only}
    1. Ly‐Pen D, Andréu JL, Blas G, Sánchez‐Olaso A, Millán I. Surgical decompression versus local steroid injection in carpal tunnel syndrome. A one‐year, prospective, randomized, open, controlled clinical trial. Arthritis & Rheumatism 2005;52(2):612‐19. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Sparapani 2006 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Sparapani FVC, Aguiar PHP, Zicarelli CAM, Hirata MTA, Tedesco‐Marchese AJ, Teixeira MJ. Comparison between the clinical and surgical treatment in carpal tunnel syndrome by means of electrophysiological analysis [Comparação entre tratamentos clínico e cirúrgico da síndrome do túnel do carpo por métodos de análises eletrofisiológicas]. Jornal Brasileiro de Neurocirurgia 2006;17(2):52‐5.

References to studies awaiting assessment

Elwakil 2007 {published data only}
    1. Elwakil TF, Elazzazi A, Shokeir H. Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome by low‐level laser versus open carpal tunnel release. Lasers in medical science 2007;22(4):265‐70. [PMID: 17334675] - PubMed
Ucan 2006 {published data only}
    1. Ucan H, Yagci I, Yilmaz L, Yagmurlu F, Keskin D, Bodur H. Comparison of splinting, splinting plus local steroid injection and open carpal tunnel release outcomes in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Rheumatology International 2006;27(1):45‐51. - PubMed

Additional references

AAN 1993
    1. American Academy of Neurology. Practice parameter for carpal tunnel syndrome (summary statement). Neurology 1993;43(11):2406‐09. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Carroll 1987
    1. Carroll GJ. Comparison of median and radial nerve sensory latencies in the electrophysiological diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1987;68(2):101‐6. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Dawson 1999
    1. Dawson DM, Feske SK. Degenerative and Compressive Structural Disorders. In: Goetz CG, Pappert EJ editor(s). Textbook of Clinical Neurology. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 1999.
de Krom 1992
    1. Krom MC, Knipschild PG, Kester AD, Thijs CT, Boekkooi PF, Spaans F. Carpal tunnel syndrome: prevalence in the general population. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1992;45(4):373‐6. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Felsenthal 1977
    1. Felsenthal G. Median and ulnar distal motor and sensory latencies in the same normal subject. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1977;58(7):297‐302. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Geiringer 1998
    1. Geiringer SR. The value of inching techniques in the diagnosis of focal nerve lesions. Inching techniques are of limited use. Muscle & Nerve 1998;21(11):1557‐9. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Kimura 1979
    1. Kimura J. The carpal tunnel syndrome: localization of conduction abnormalities within the distal segment of the median nerve. Brain 1979;102(3):619‐35. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Leigh 1998
    1. Leigh JP, Miller TR. Job‐related diseases and occupations within a large workers‐compensation data set. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 1998;33(3):197‐211. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Martyn 1997
    1. Martyn CN, Hughes RAC. Epidemiology of peripheral neuropathy. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1997;62(4):310‐8. [MEDLINE: ] - PMC - PubMed
Miller 1994
    1. Miller RS, Iverson DC, Fried RA, Green LA, Nutting TA. Carpal tunnel syndrome in primary care: a report from ASPN. Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network. Journal of Family Practice 1994;38(4):337‐44. [PMID 8163957] - PubMed
Rosenbaum 1993
    1. Rosenbaum RB, Ochoa JL. Carpal tunnel syndrome and other disorders of the median nerve. Stoneham, MA: Butterworth‐Heinemann, 1993.
Rossignol 1997
    1. Rossignol M, Stock S, Patry L, Armstrong B. Carpal tunnel syndrome: what is attributable to work?. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 1997;54(7):519‐23. [MEDLINE: ] - PMC - PubMed
Scholten 2007
    1. Scholten RJPM, Gerritsen AAM, Uitdehaag BMJ, Geldere D, Vet HCW, Bouter LM. Surgical treatment options for carpal tunnel syndrome (Cochrane Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003905.pub3] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Schulz 1995
    1. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association 1995;273(5):408‐12. - PubMed
Stevens 1997
    1. Stevens JC. AAEM minimonograph: 26: the electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Muscle & Nerve 1997;20(12):1477‐86. - PubMed
Stewart 1993
    1. Stewart JD. Compression and entrapment neuropathies. In: Dyck PJ, et al. editor(s). Peripheral Neuropathy. 3rd Edition. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1993.
Vasiliadis 2014a
    1. Vasiliadis HS, Georgoulas P, Shrier I, Salanti G, Scholten RJPM. Endoscopic release for carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008265.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Vasiliadis 2014b
    1. Vasiliadis HS, Sakellaridou ME, Shrier I, Salanti G, Scholten RJPM. Open release for carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011041] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Verdugo 1994
    1. Verdugo RJ, Ochoa JL. "Sympathetically maintained pain" I. Phentolamine block questions the concept. Neurology 1994;44(6):1003‐10. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances