Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Dec;17(6):391-8.
doi: 10.1136/tc.2008.026476. Epub 2008 Oct 9.

"Working to shape what society's expectations of us should be": Philip Morris' societal alignment strategy

Affiliations

"Working to shape what society's expectations of us should be": Philip Morris' societal alignment strategy

J S Yang et al. Tob Control. 2008 Dec.

Abstract

Background: A key element of Philip Morris's (PM's) corporate social responsibility initiatives is "societal alignment", defined as "strategies and programs to meet society's expectations of a responsible tobacco company". This study explored the genesis and implementation of Philip Morris' (PM) societal alignment efforts.

Methods: The study retrieved and analysed approximately 375 previously undisclosed PM documents now available electronically. Using an iterative process, the study categorised themes and prepared a case analysis.

Results: Beginning in 1999, PM sought to become "societally aligned" by identifying expectations of a responsible tobacco company through public opinion research and developing and publicising programs to meet those expectations. Societal alignment was undertaken within the US and globally to ensure an environment favourable to PM's business objectives. Despite PM's claims to be "changing", however, societal alignment in practice was highly selective. PM responded to public "expectations" largely by retooling existing positions and programs, while entirely ignoring other expectations that might have interfered with its business goals. It also appears that convincing employees of the value and authenticity of societal alignment was difficult.

Conclusions: As implementation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control proceeds, tobacco control advocates should closely monitor development of such "alignment" initiatives and expose the motivations and contradictions they reveal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: REM owns one share each of Altria/Philip Morris, Philip Morris International and Reynolds American stock for research and advocacy purposes. REM served as a tobacco industry documents consultant for the US Department of Justice in United States of America vs Philip Morris et al.

References

    1. Blowfield M, Frynas JG. Setting new agendas: critical perspectives on corporate social responsibility in the developing world. Int Aff. 2005;81:499–513.
    1. Collin J, Gilmore A. Corporate (anti)social (ir)responsibility: transnational tobacco companies and the attempted subversion of global health policy. Glob Soc Policy. 2002;2:354–60.
    1. Hirschhorn N. Corporate social responsibility and the tobacco industry: hope or hype? Tob Control. 2004;13:447–53. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Philip Morris USA. Our approach to responsibility. [accessed 10 June 2008]. http://www.philipmorrisusa.com/en/cms/Responsibility/Our_Approach_to_Res....
    1. British American Tobacco. Operating responsibly. [accessed 10 June 2008]. http://www.bat.com/group/sites/uk__3mnfen.nsf/vwPagesWebLive/DO52AD7G?op....

Publication types