Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2008 Nov;40(11):1962-9.
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817eee9d.

To cool, but not too cool: that is the question--immersion cooling for hyperthermia

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

To cool, but not too cool: that is the question--immersion cooling for hyperthermia

Nigel A S Taylor et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Nov.

Abstract

Introduction: Patient cooling time can impact upon the prognosis of heat illness. Although ice-cold-water immersion will rapidly extract heat, access to ice or cold water may be limited in hot climates. Indeed, some have concerns regarding the sudden cold-water immersion of hyperthermic individuals, whereas others believe that cutaneous vasoconstriction may reduce convective heat transfer from the core. It was hypothesized that warmer immersion temperatures, which induce less powerful vasoconstriction, may still facilitate rapid cooling in hyperthermic individuals.

Methods: Eight males participated in three trials and were heated to an esophageal temperature of 39.5 degrees C by exercising in the heat (36 degrees C, 50% relative humidity) while wearing a water-perfusion garment (40 degrees C). Subjects were cooled using each of the following methods: air (20-22 degrees C), cold-water immersion (14 degrees C), and temperate-water immersion (26 degrees C).

Results: The time to reach an esophageal temperature of 37.5 degrees C averaged 22.81 min (air), 2.16 min (cold), and 2.91 min (temperate). Whereas each of the between-trial comparisons was statistically significant (P < 0.05), cooling in temperate water took only marginally longer than that in cold water, and one cannot imagine that the 45-s cooling time difference would have any meaningful physiological or clinical implications.

Conclusion: It is assumed that this rapid heat loss was due to a less powerful peripheral vasoconstrictor response, with central heat being more rapidly transported to the skin surface for dissipation. Although the core-to-water thermal gradient was much smaller with temperate-water cooling, greater skin and deeper tissue blood flows would support a superior convective heat delivery. Thus, a sustained physiological mechanism (blood flow) appears to have countered a less powerful thermal gradient, resulting in clinically insignificant differences in heat extraction between the cold and temperate cooling trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • In defense of cold water.
    Casa DJ, Kenny GP. Casa DJ, et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 May;41(5):1164; author reply 1165. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31819c7013. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009. PMID: 19454844 No abstract available.
  • How cool does immersion cooling for hyperthermia need to be?
    Dugas J. Dugas J. Clin J Sport Med. 2009 Nov;19(6):508-9. doi: 10.1097/01.jsm.0000363794.30349.5c. Clin J Sport Med. 2009. PMID: 19898083 No abstract available.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources