Effects of diltiazem and metoprolol on blood pressure, adverse symptoms and general well-being. The Swedish Diltiazem-Metoprolol Multi-Centre Study Group
- PMID: 1884720
- DOI: 10.1007/BF00315222
Effects of diltiazem and metoprolol on blood pressure, adverse symptoms and general well-being. The Swedish Diltiazem-Metoprolol Multi-Centre Study Group
Abstract
General well-being, adverse effects and anti-hypertensive efficacy have been investigated in a double blind, parallel-group, dose-response multicentre study of diltiazem and metoprolol monotherapy for hypertension. 128 patients with primary hypertension were included from 10 participating centres. The patients were randomized to receive oral diltiazem 120-240-360 mg/day or metoprolol 50-100-200 mg/day. Each dose was given for a 4-week period as a forced titration regime. In all 119 patients, 59 and 60, respectively, on diltiazem and metoprolol completed the study protocol. There were dose-dependent reductions in supine and standing blood pressures (BP) after both diltiazem and metoprolol therapy. In the diltiazem group, supine BP was reduced by 10 (11)/10 (6) mmHg (SBP/DBP) at the highest dose level, and the corresponding values for the metoprolol group were 7 (16)/8 (9) mmHg (SBP/DBP). Target pressures (DBP less than or equal to 90 mmHg and/or a reduction in DBP of greater than or equal to 10%) were reached in 63% and 48% of the patients, respectively. The incidence and severity of dose-dependent adverse effects, as evaluated by spontaneous reports or open and direct questioning, did not differ between treatments. Subjective well-being, evaluated by a self-administered questionnaire, the MSE-profile, did not differ significantly between diltiazem and metoprolol therapy. However, after an initial slight deterioration, contentment and vitality tended to improve with increasing doses of diltiazem, while a dose-related deterioration in these variables was observed on metoprolol therapy. At the highest dose levels, contentment and vitality tended to be better in the diltiazem than the metoprolol group. Thus, diltiazem and metoprolol in daily doses of 120-360 mg and 50-200 mg, respectively, produce comparable and parallel reductions in supine and standing BP. However, while subjective well-being tended to improve with increasing doses of diltiazem, there was a negative trend for metoprolol. It is concluded that diltiazem, given as monotherapy to hypertensive patients, does not impair subjective well-being.
Similar articles
-
A comparison of diltiazem and metoprolol in hypertension. Swedish Diltiazem-Metoprolol Multicentre Study Group.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1990;39(5):427-33. doi: 10.1007/BF00280931. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1990. PMID: 2076733 Clinical Trial.
-
Diltiazem compared with metoprolol as add-on-therapies to diuretics in hypertension. Swedish Diltiazem-Metoprolol Multicentre Study Group.J Hum Hypertens. 1991 Apr;5(2):107-14. J Hum Hypertens. 1991. PMID: 2072368 Clinical Trial.
-
A dose escalation trial comparing the combination of diltiazem SR and hydrochlorothiazide with the monotherapies in patients with essential hypertension.J Hum Hypertens. 1992 Apr;6(2):133-8. J Hum Hypertens. 1992. PMID: 1597846 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical experience with a once-daily, extended-release formulation of diltiazem in the treatment of hypertension.Am J Med. 1992 Aug 31;93(2A):56S-64S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90295-m. Am J Med. 1992. PMID: 1519637 Review.
-
Felodipine/metoprolol: a review of the fixed dose controlled release formulation in the management of essential hypertension.Drugs. 2000 Jan;59(1):141-57. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200059010-00011. Drugs. 2000. PMID: 10718104 Review.
Cited by
-
Metoprolol: a pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life evaluation of its use in hypertension, post-myocardial infarction and dilated cardiomyopathy.Pharmacoeconomics. 1994 Oct;6(4):370-400. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199406040-00004. Pharmacoeconomics. 1994. PMID: 10147474 Review.
-
Quality-of-life instruments in hypertension.Pharmacoeconomics. 1994 Dec;6(6):523-35. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199406060-00006. Pharmacoeconomics. 1994. PMID: 10155282 Review.
-
Health-related quality-of-life measurement in hypertension. A review of randomised controlled drug trials.Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Nov;18(5):435-50. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200018050-00003. Pharmacoeconomics. 2000. PMID: 11151397 Review.
-
Quality of life claims in trials of anti-hypertensive therapy.Qual Life Res. 1997 Mar;6(2):185-91. doi: 10.1023/a:1026498318938. Qual Life Res. 1997. PMID: 9161118 Review.
-
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of once-daily versus twice-daily formulations of diltiazem in the treatment of systemic hypertension. The Canadian Multicenter Diltiazem-CD Hypertension Trial Group.Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1995 Jun;9(3):413-20. doi: 10.1007/BF00879030. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1995. PMID: 8527351 Clinical Trial.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical