Procalcitonin-guided antibiotic use vs a standard approach for acute respiratory tract infections in primary care
- PMID: 18852401
- DOI: 10.1001/archinte.168.18.2000
Procalcitonin-guided antibiotic use vs a standard approach for acute respiratory tract infections in primary care
Abstract
Background: Acute respiratory tract infections are the most common reason for antibiotic therapy in primary care despite their mainly viral etiology. A laboratory test measuring procalcitonin levels in blood specimens was suggested as a tool to reduce unnecessary prescribing of antibiotics. We consider whether antibiotic therapy guided by procalcitonin reduces the use of antibiotics without increasing the restrictions experienced by patients by more than 1 day.
Methods: Fifty-three primary care physicians recruited 458 patients, each patient with an acute respiratory tract infection and, in the physician's opinion, in need of antibiotics. Patients were centrally randomized to either a procalcitonin-guided approach to antibiotic therapy or to a standard approach. For patients randomized to procalcitonin-guided therapy, the use of antibiotics was more or less strongly discouraged (procalcitonin level, < or =0.1 or < or =0.25 microg/L, respectively) or recommended (procalcitonin level, >0.25 microg/L). Follow-up data were collected at 7 days by treating physicians and at 14 and 28 days by blinded interviewers.
Results: Adjusted for baseline characteristics, the mean increase at 14 days in days in which activities were restricted was 0.14 with procalcitonin-guided therapy (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.53 to 0.81 days), which met our criterion of an increase in days in which activities were restricted by no more than 1 day. With procalcitonin-guided therapy, the antibiotic prescription rate was 72% lower (95% CI, 66%-78%) than with standard therapy. Both approaches led to a similar proportion of patients reporting symptoms of ongoing or relapsing infection at 28 days (adjusted odds ratio, 1.0 [95% CI, 0.7-1.5]).
Conclusions: As an adjunct to guidelines, procalcitonin-guided therapy markedly reduces antibiotic use for acute respiratory tract infections in primary care without compromising patient outcome. In practice, this could be achieved with 1 to 2 procalcitonin measurements in patients for whom the physician intends to prescribe antibiotics.
Comment in
-
Procalcitonin-guided antibiotic use in acute respiratory tract infections.Arch Intern Med. 2009 Apr 13;169(7):716. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.27. Arch Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19365003 No abstract available.
-
Procalcitonin-guided antibiotic use in primary care: the ultimate proof still ahead.Arch Intern Med. 2009 Apr 13;169(7):717-8. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.31. Arch Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19365004 No abstract available.
-
How efficient is procalcitonin-guided antibiotic use in acute respiratory tract infections in primary care?Arch Intern Med. 2009 Jul 13;169(13):1244. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.182. Arch Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19597077 No abstract available.
-
[Procalcitonin-guided antibiotic use vs. a standard approach for acute respiratory tract infection in primary care].Praxis (Bern 1994). 2009 Nov 18;98(23):1383-4. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157.98.23.1383. Praxis (Bern 1994). 2009. PMID: 19918733 German. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous