Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Nov;21(6):606-12.
doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e32830eb6b4.

Recent advances in shared decision making for mental health

Affiliations
Review

Recent advances in shared decision making for mental health

Sapana R Patel et al. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2008 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Shared decision making (SDM) in nonmental health populations has documented positive services and health benefits. To advance integration of SDM into mental healthcare, researchers have outlined several priorities for future research. These include (1) clarifying the role of SDM in mental healthcare; (2) understanding patient and provider perspectives on SDM; (3) assessment of SDM practice in mental health settings; and (4) outcomes of SDM in mental health populations. This article will review recent advances in these areas.

Recent findings: The current literature shows that SDM can play a role in the mental health treatment process from entry into care to recovery. Patients and providers find SDM acceptable and express a willingness to engage in SDM for reasons that are multifactorial. Barriers to SDM exist in mental health decision making including patient preferences and provider-level biases. Lastly, outcome research provides encouraging preliminary evidence for feasibility and effectiveness of SDM during the mental health encounter.

Summary: Although there have not been a great number of SDM studies in mental health to date, the positive effects of SDM are comparable to those documented in general nonmental health patient groups, suggesting that future research has the potential to result in findings that are likely to be helpful for patients with psychiatric disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Benbassat J, Pilpel D, Tidhar M. Patients’ preferences for participation in clinical decision making: A review of published surveys. Behav Med. 1998;24:81–88. - PubMed
    1. Cooper LA. At the center of the decision-making in mental health services and interventions research: Patients, clinicians, or relationships? (Commentary) Clin Psychol- Sci Pr. 2006;15:26–29.
    1. Wills CE, Holmes-Rovner M. Integrating decision-making and mental health interventions research: Research directions. Clin Psychol-Sci Pr. 2006;13:9–25. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine. Improving the quality of health care for mental and substance use conditions: Quality chasm series. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2005. - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine: Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.

Publication types