Interpretative commenting
- PMID: 18852867
- PMCID: PMC2556593
Interpretative commenting
Abstract
* Clinical laboratories should be able to offer interpretation of the results they produce. * At a minimum, contact details for interpretative advice should be available on laboratory reports.Interpretative comments may be verbal or written and printed. * Printed comments on reports should be offered judiciously, only where they would add value; no comment preferred to inappropriate or dangerous comment. * Interpretation should be based on locally agreed or nationally recognised clinical guidelines where available. * Standard tied comments ("canned" comments) can have some limited use.Individualised narrative comments may be particularly useful in the case of tests that are new, complex or unfamiliar to the requesting clinicians and where clinical details are available. * Interpretative commenting should only be provided by appropriately trained and credentialed personnel. * Audit of comments and continued professional development of personnel providing them are important for quality assurance.
Similar articles
-
Quality assessment of interpretative commenting in clinical chemistry.Clin Chem. 2004 Mar;50(3):632-7. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2003.024877. Clin Chem. 2004. PMID: 14981029
-
Assuring the quality of interpretative comments in clinical chemistry.Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016 Dec 1;54(12):1901-1911. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0709. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016. PMID: 27641826
-
Quality of interpretative commenting on common clinical chemistry results in the Asia-Pacific region and Africa.Clin Chem Lab Med. 2009;47(8):963-70. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2009.225. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2009. PMID: 19589106
-
Anatomy and history of an external quality assessment program for interpretative comments in clinical biochemistry.Clin Biochem. 2015 May;48(7-8):467-71. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.12.014. Epub 2014 Dec 24. Clin Biochem. 2015. PMID: 25543064 Review.
-
Interpretative commenting in clinical chemistry with worked examples for thyroid function test reports.Pract Lab Med. 2021 Jul 9;26:e00243. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2021.e00243. eCollection 2021 Aug. Pract Lab Med. 2021. PMID: 34286057 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The Role and Limitations of the Reference Interval Within Clinical Chemistry and Its Reliability for Disease Detection.Br J Biomed Sci. 2024 Feb 28;81:12339. doi: 10.3389/bjbs.2024.12339. eCollection 2024. Br J Biomed Sci. 2024. PMID: 38481978 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Italian external quality assessment program for Cystic Fibrosis sweat chloride test: CFTR modulators and the impact of a new sweat test report form.Pract Lab Med. 2024 May 21;40:e00403. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00403. eCollection 2024 May. Pract Lab Med. 2024. PMID: 38818249 Free PMC article.
-
The Paraprotein - an Enduring Biomarker.Clin Biochem Rev. 2019 Feb;40(1):5-22. Clin Biochem Rev. 2019. PMID: 30828116 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Biochemistry on the human scale.Clin Biochem Rev. 2010 Nov;31(4):121-8. Clin Biochem Rev. 2010. PMID: 21170258 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- ISO 15189:2003. Medical laboratories – Particular requirements for quality and competence. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 2003.
-
- National Pathology Accreditation Advisory Council. Requirements for pathology laboratories (2007 Edition) [(Accessed 26 February 2008)]. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/4B4BC09A2A....
-
- Code of practice for clinical biochemists (chemical pathologists) and clinical biochemistry services. [(Accessed 26 February 2008)]. http://www.rcpath.org/resources/pdf/G027-ClinBioCodeOfPractice-May05.pdf.
-
- Clinical Pathology Accreditation (UK) Ltd. Standards for the Medical Laboratory. [(Accessed 26 February 2008)]. http://www.cpa-uk.co.uk/files/pdlabst.pdf?bcsi_scan_276FAA45874D151E=0&b....
-
- The Royal College of Pathologists. Guidelines for the provision of interpretative comments on biochemical reports. Bull R Coll Pathol. 1998;104:25.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources