Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Feb;31(1):90-4.
doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn040. Epub 2008 Oct 14.

An exploratory study of the cost-effectiveness of orthodontic care in seven European countries

Affiliations
Comparative Study

An exploratory study of the cost-effectiveness of orthodontic care in seven European countries

Jamie Deans et al. Eur J Orthod. 2009 Feb.

Abstract

This study investigated the orthodontic treatment of 429 consecutive patients [172 male (40.1 per cent) and 257 female (59.9 per cent)] carried out by 10 orthodontic specialist practitioners in seven European countries [two in the Czech Republic (A and B), two in Germany (A and B), Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, and Netherlands, and two in Slovenia (A and B)]. The median age of the patients at the start of treatment was 13.0 years (minimum 7.3 years maximum 50.3 years). The patients had a range of malocclusions and the majority (97 per cent) were treated with upper and lower fixed appliances. Real exchange rates were calculated using purchasing power parity (PPP) indicators to allow cross-border comparisons of costs. The Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need (ICON) was used to measure the effectiveness of treatment and cost per ICON point reduction to compare cost-effectiveness of orthodontic treatment between practitioners in different European countries. The median cost per ICON point reduction for all the cases treated was 57.69 euro. The median cost per ICON point reduction varied greatly between practitioners from 21.70 euro (Lithuania) to 116.62 euro (Slovenia A). Analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc tests showed the differences in cost-effectiveness between the practitioners to be statistically significant (P<0.001). The cost per ICON point reduction is a simple and effective method of comparing cost-effectiveness between orthodontic practitioners in different countries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Box plot of data for cost per Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need (ICON) change for practitioners in this study.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Atherly A, Culler S, Becker E. The role of cost-effectiveness analysis in health evaluation. Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2000;44:112–120. - PubMed
    1. Daniels C, Richmond S. The development of the index of complexity, outcome and need (ICON) Journal of Orthodontics. 2000;27:149–162. - PubMed
    1. Efron B, Tibrishani R. An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 1993.
    1. Evans M, Shaw W. Preliminary evaluation of an illustrated scale for the rating of dental attractiveness. European Journal of Orthodontics. 1987;9:314–318. - PubMed
    1. Fox-Rushby J, Mills A, Walker D. Setting health priorities: the development of cost-effectiveness league tables. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation. 2001;79:679–680. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms