Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Guideline
. 2008 Aug;103(8):1258-68.
doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02277.x.

Guidelines for research on drugged driving

Affiliations
Guideline

Guidelines for research on drugged driving

J Michael Walsh et al. Addiction. 2008 Aug.

Abstract

Aims: A major problem in assessing the true public health impact of drug-use on driving and overall traffic safety is that the variables being measured across studies vary significantly. In studies reported in a growing global literature, basic parameters assessed, analytical techniques and drugs tested are simply not comparable due to lack of standardization in the field. These shortcomings severely limit the value of this research to add knowledge to the field. A set of standards to harmonize research findings is sorely needed. This project was initiated by several international organizations to develop guidelines for research on drugged driving.

Methods: A September 2006 meeting of international experts discussed the harmonization of protocols for future research on drugged driving. The principal objective of the meeting was to develop a consensus report setting guidelines, standards, core data variables and other controls that would form the basis for future international research. A modified Delphi method was utilized to develop draft guidelines. Subsequently, these draft guidelines were posted on the internet for global review, and comments received were integrated into the final document.

Results: The Guidelines Document is divided into three major sections, each focusing upon different aspects of drugged driving research (e.g. roadside surveys, prevalence studies, hospital studies, fatality and crash investigations, etc.) within the critical issue areas of 'behavior', 'epidemiology' and 'toxicology'. The behavioral section contains 32 specific recommendations; (2) epidemiology 40 recommendations; and (3) toxicology 64 recommendations.

Conclusions: It is anticipated that these guidelines will improve significantly the overall quality of drugged driving research and facilitate future cross-study comparisons nationally and globally.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations of interest: None.

Comment in

References

    1. Walsh JM, de Gier J, Christopherson A, Verstraete A. Drugs and driving. Traffic Inj Prev. 2004;5:241–53. - PubMed
    1. Jones RK, Shinar D, Walsh JM. State of knowledge of drug-impaired driving. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration DOT. 2003 September; Report no. 809 642.
    1. Drummer OH, Gerostamoulos J, Batziris H, Chu M, Caple-horn JR, Robertson MD, et al. The incidence of drugs in drivers killed in Australian road traffic crashes. Forensic Sci Int. 2003;134:154–62. - PubMed
    1. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) Lisbon, Portugal: 2003. Drugs and driving. ELDD comparative study. [accessed 18 June 2008]. (homepage on the internet) Available at: http://eldd.emcdda.europa.eu.
    1. Mørland J. Driving under the influence of non-alcoholic drugs. Forensic Sci Rev. 2000;12:80–105. - PubMed

Publication types