Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jan;12(1):3-10.

Revascularization treatment in patients with coronary artery disease

Affiliations

Revascularization treatment in patients with coronary artery disease

S G Foussas et al. Hippokratia. 2008 Jan.

Abstract

The choice of optimal revascularization strategy in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is becoming more challenging lately, due to recent advances in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG). On one hand, drug-eluting stents (DES) have emerged as a solution to the problem of restenosis after balloon angioplasty or bare-metal stent implantation, which was responsible for a higher rate of events (mainly repeat revascularization) in relation to CABG. On the other hand, off-pump bypass techniques and minimally invasive grafting of the left anterior descending artery appear to be safe and efficacious alternatives to traditional, on-pump CABG. Available literature includes studies outdated by current technologies, leaving the dilemma of best revascularization strategy unanswered in the general CAD population, but also in high-risk groups, such as diabetics and patients with chronic kidney disease. A number of ongoing trials, especially designed for this purpose, are set to end the debate, providing headto- head comparisons between DES-assisted PCI and contemporary bypass surgery.

Keywords: coronary artery bypass grafting; drug-eluting stents; percutaneous coronary intervention; pump bypass surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fox K, Garcia MA, Ardissino D, et al. Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive summary: the Task Force on the management of Stable Angina Pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:1341–1381. - PubMed
    1. RITA Trial Participants. Coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery: the Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trial. Lancet. 1993;341:573–580. - PubMed
    1. Henderson RA, Pocock SJ, Sharp SJ, et al. Long-term results of RITA-1 trial: clinical and cost comparisons of coronary angioplasty and coronary-artery bypass grafting. Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina. Lancet. 1998;352:1419–1425. - PubMed
    1. CABRI Trial Participants. First-year results of CABRI (Coronary Angioplasty versus Bypass Revascularisation Investigation) Lancet. 1995;346:1179–1184. - PubMed
    1. Kurbaan AS, Rickards AF, Ilsley CD, et al. Relation between coronary artery disease, baseline clinical variables, revascularization mode, and mortality. CABRI Participants. Coronary Angioplasty vs. Bypass Revascularisation Investigation. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86:938–942. - PubMed