Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Oct;26(8):857-66.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.11.025.

Forensic sexual assault examination and genital injury: is skin color a source of health disparity?

Marilyn S Sommers  1 , Therese M Zink, Jamison D Fargo, Rachel B Baker, Carol Buschur, Donna Z Shambley-Ebron, Bonnie S Fisher
Affiliations

Forensic sexual assault examination and genital injury: is skin color a source of health disparity?

Marilyn S Sommers et al. Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: The study objectives were to (1) estimate the frequency, prevalence, type, and location of anogenital injury in black and white women after consensual sex and (2) investigate the role of skin color in the detection of injury during the forensic sexual assault examination.

Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive design was used with 120 healthy volunteers who underwent a well-controlled forensic examination after consensual sexual intercourse.

Results: Fifty-five percent of the sample had at least 1 anogenital injury after consensual intercourse; percentages significantly differed between white (68%) and black (43%) participants (P = .02). Race/ethnicity was a significant predictor of injury prevalence and frequency in the external genitalia but not in the internal genitalia or anus. However, skin color variables--lightness/darkness-, redness/greenness-, and yellowness/blueness-confounded the original relationship between race/ethnicity and injury occurrence and frequency in the external genitalia, and 1 skin color variable--redness/greenness--was significantly associated with injury occurrence and frequency in the internal genitalia.

Conclusions: Although differences exist in anogenital injury frequency and prevalence between black and white women, such differences can be more fully explained by variations in skin color rather than race/ethnicity. Clinical recommendations and criminal justice implications are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Tjaden P, Thoennes N. Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, (DC): National Institute of Justice and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2000.
    1. Rennison C. Rape and sexual assault: reporting to police and medical attention, 1992–2000. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2002.
    1. Gray-Eurom K, Seaberg D, Wears R. The prosecution of sexual assault cases: correlation with forensic evidence. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;39:39–46. - PubMed
    1. McGregor M, Du Mont J, Myhr T. Sexual assault forensic medical examination: is evidence related to successful prosecution? Ann Emerg Med. 2002;39:639–47. - PubMed
    1. Rambow B, Adkinson C, Frost TH, et al. Female sexual assault: medical and legal implications. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21:727–31. - PubMed

Publication types