Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Mar;13(1):15-9.
doi: 10.1007/s10006-008-0139-z.

Complications after nasal skin repair with local flaps and full-thickness skin grafts and implications of patients' contentment

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Complications after nasal skin repair with local flaps and full-thickness skin grafts and implications of patients' contentment

Jan Rustemeyer et al. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: The range of complications after plastic surgical repair of nasal skin defects is not clearly known. The aim of this study was to identify complications after reconstruction of nasal skin defects to determine what typical complications occur after standard surgical options including full-thickness skin graft (FTSG) and local flap plastics (LFP).

Materials and methods: In 210 patients with defects of the nasal tip, the nasal ala or dorsum of the nose (average diameter 1.1 +/- 0.3 cm) surgical skin repair was performed with LFP or FTSG. Complications within 6 months after surgery were recorded.

Results: Some 41 patients (19.5%) suffered complications; there was no significant difference in total complication rate between LFP (20.5%) and FTSG (18.3%). However, FTSG patients had significantly more infections postoperatively than LFP patients (5.4% vs. 2.6%). LFP patients presented a significantly higher rate of wound or suture dehiscence (FTSG 2.2%, LFP 5.9%). FTSG patients exhibited a significantly higher rate of partial or complete loss (total rate FTSG 8.5%, LFP 5.2%). The LFP technique led to significantly more aesthetic deficits (FTSG 2.1%, LFP 6.8%).

Conclusions: LFP showed advantages with regard to infection and loss rates but with a higher rate of aesthetic deficits compared to FTSG. It remains an individual decision as to which procedure is used to repair defects of the nose, depending on patient and surgical variables.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Dermatol Surg. 2005 May;31(5):546-52 - PubMed
    1. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 May;119(6):1767-72 - PubMed
    1. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2003 Aug;48(4):211-5 - PubMed
    1. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2008 Jun;53(3):272-7 - PubMed
    1. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Apr;115(4):1077-86 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources