Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Jan 29;113(5):1062-70.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-07-168146. Epub 2008 Oct 21.

Properties and structure-function relationships of veltuzumab (hA20), a humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Properties and structure-function relationships of veltuzumab (hA20), a humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody

David M Goldenberg et al. Blood. .

Erratum in

  • Blood. 2009 May 21;113(21):5368

Abstract

Veltuzumab is a humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody with complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) identical to rituximab, except for one residue at the 101st position (Kabat numbering) in CDR3 of the variable heavy chain (V(H)), having aspartic acid (Asp) instead of asparagine (Asn), with framework regions of epratuzumab, a humanized anti-CD22 antibody. When compared with rituximab, veltuzumab has significantly reduced off-rates in 3 human lymphoma cell lines tested, as well as increased complement-dependent cytotoxicity in 1 of 3 cell lines, but no other in vitro differences. Mutation studies confirmed that the differentiation of the off-rate between veltuzumab and rituximab is related to the single amino acid change in CDR3-V(H). Studies of intraperitoneal and subcutaneous doses in mouse models of human lymphoma and in normal cynomolgus monkeys disclosed that low doses of veltuzumab control tumor growth or deplete circulating or sessile B cells. Low- and high-dose veltuzumab were significantly more effective in vivo than rituximab in 3 lymphoma models. These findings are consistent with activity in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma given low intravenous or subcutaneous doses of veltuzumab. Thus, changing Asn(101) to Asp(101) in CDR3-V(H) of rituximab is responsible for veltuzumab's lower off-rate and apparent improved potency in preclinical models that could translate into advantages in patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of off-rates from live cells. Daudi (A), Ramos (B), and Raji (C-E) cells were stained with PE-labeled rituximab (▵), veltuzumab (blue filled square), cA20 (red triangle), D101N (green filled circle), 1F5 (purple open circle) or B1 (gray open square). The labeled mAbs were incubated at 37°C with (A-D) or without (E) excess veltuzumab Fab′-NEM, and the cells were analyzed by flow cytometry over time. The off-rate was determined by nonlinear regression (one-phase exponential decay) and P values were generated by F test using GraphPad Prism software.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Ex vivo depletion of B cells and lymphoma cells. (A) The effect of veltuzumab on peripheral blood lymphocytes from healthy volunteers was evaluated in vitro using flow cytometry. Decrease in the percentage of CD19+ cells present in the lymphocyte gate after a 2-day incubation of heparinized whole blood of healthy volunteers with veltuzumab is shown. Each line represents a different blood donor. Error bars, standard deviation. (B) The effects of veltuzumab and rituximab on peripheral blood B cells and Raji lymphoma cells are shown as the number of CD19+ events relative to untreated cell mixtures. B cells are derived as the CD19+ cells in the lymphocyte gate, while Raji cells are located in the monocytes gate. Error bars indicate standard deviation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Evaluation of in vivo efficacy in mouse models. (A) Survival of mice in a disseminated Burkitt lymphoma xenograft model was compared for veltuzumab treatment via intraperitoneal versus subcutaneous administration. SCID mice were administered 1.5 × 107 Daudi cells intravenously on day 0. Therapy with veltuzumab began on day 1 with mice receiving either a single intraperitoneal or single subcutaneous injection of veltuzumab at does of 60, 20, or 5 μg. Control mice received an intraperitoneal injection of either saline or 60 μg hMN-14 IgG (labetuzumab, anti-CEACAM5 isotype-matched antibody). (B) The minimal effective dose of veltuzumab was determined in a disseminated Burkitt lymphoma xenograft model. SCID mice were administered 1.5 × 107 Daudi cells intravenously on day 0. Therapy with veltuzumab began on day 1 with a single intraperitoneal injection of veltuzumab. Doses administered were 0.5, 0.25, 0.1, or 0.05 μg veltuzumab. Control mice received a 200-μL intraperitoneal injection of saline. (C) Survival of mice bearing disseminated follicular cell lymphoma was examined for treatment with decreasing doses of veltuzumab. SCID mice were administered 2.5 × 106 WSU-FSCCL cells intravenously on day 0. On day 5, mice received a single intraperitoneal injection of veltuzumab at a dose of 35, 3.5, 0.35, or 0.035 μg. Control mice received only saline.
Figure 4
Figure 4
In vivo effects of veltuzumab compared with rituximab and after NK/neutrophil depletion in Raji lymphoma model. (A) Comparison of therapeutic effects on survival of RPCI-SCID mice bearing Raji lymphoma cells treated with 10 mg/kg veltuzumab or rituximab (or untreated control) on days 5, 10, 15, and 20 after tumor inoculation intravenously (N = 15 per group), indicating significantly improved survival (P = .005) of the veltuzumab group compared with the rituximab group. (B) The effect of depleting NK cells and neutrophils on anti-lymphoma activity in SCID mice. Veltuzumab therapy consisted of 200 μg given intravenously on days 3, 5, 7, and 11; control mice received 100 μL saline. Depletion of NK cells and neutrophils abrogated the anti-lymphoma activity of veltuzumab.

References

    1. Sharkey RM, Goldenberg DM. Targeted therapy of cancer: new prospects for antibodies and immunoconjugates. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56:226–243. - PubMed
    1. Castillo J, Winer E, Quesenberry P. Newer monoclonal antibodies for hematological malignancies. Exp Hematol. 2008;36:755–768. - PubMed
    1. Stein R, Qu Z, Chen S, et al. Characterization of a new humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. IMMU-106, and its use in combination with the humanized anti-CD22 antibody, epratuzumab, for the therapy of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:2868–2878. - PubMed
    1. Teeling JL, French RR, Cragg MS, et al. Characterization of new human CD20 monoclonal antibodies with potent cytolytic activity against non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 2004;104:1793–1800. - PubMed
    1. Vugmeyster Y, Beyer J, Howell K, et al. Depletion of B cells by a humanized anti-CD20 antibody PRO70769 in Macaca fascicularis. J Immunother. 2005;28:212–219. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms