Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Oct 22:6:10.
doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-6-10.

Step-wedge cluster-randomised community-based trials: an application to the study of the impact of community health insurance

Manuela De Allegri  1 , Subhash Pokhrel, Heiko Becher, Hengjin Dong, Ulrich Mansmann, Bocar Kouyaté, Gisela Kynast-Wolf, Adjima Gbangou, Mamadou Sanon, John Bridges, Rainer Sauerborn
Affiliations

Step-wedge cluster-randomised community-based trials: an application to the study of the impact of community health insurance

Manuela De Allegri et al. Health Res Policy Syst. .

Abstract

Background: We describe a step-wedge cluster-randomised community-based trial which has been conducted since 2003 to accompany the implementation of a community health insurance (CHI) scheme in West Africa. The trial aims at overcoming the paucity of evidence-based information on the impact of CHI. Impact is defined in terms of changes in health service utilisation and household protection against the cost of illness. Our exclusive focus on the description and discussion of the methods is justified by the fact that the study relies on a methodology previously applied in the field of disease control, but never in the field of health financing.

Methods: First, we clarify how clusters were defined both in respect of statistical considerations and of local geographical and socio-cultural concerns. Second, we illustrate how households within clusters were sampled. Third, we expound the data collection process and the survey instruments. Finally, we outline the statistical tools to be applied to estimate the impact of CHI.

Conclusion: We discuss all design choices both in relation to methodological considerations and to specific ethical and organisational concerns faced in the field. On the basis of the appraisal of our experience, we postulate that conducting relatively sophisticated trials (such as our step-wedge cluster-randomised community-based trial) aimed at generating sound public health evidence, is both feasible and valuable also in low income settings. Our work shows that if accurately designed in conjunction with local health authorities, such trials have the potential to generate sound scientific evidence and do not hinder, but at times even facilitate, the implementation of complex health interventions such as CHI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Step – wedge cluster- randomised community – based trial.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Atim C. The Contribution of Mutual Health Organizations to Financing, Delivery, and Access to Health Care: Synthesis of Research in Nine West and Central African Countries. Bethesda, MD: Partnerships for Health Reform Project, Abt Associates Inc; 1998.
    1. Dror DM, Jacquier C. Micro-Insurance: Extending Health insurance to the Excluded. International Social Security Review. 1999;52:71–97. doi: 10.1111/1468-246X.00034. - DOI
    1. Preker AS, Carrin G, Dror D, Jakab M, Hsiao W, Arhin-Tenkorang D. Rich-Poor Differences in Health Care Financing. In: Preker AS, Carrin G, editor. Health Financing for Poor People – Resource Mobilization and Risk Sharing. Washington: The World Bank; 2004. pp. 3–52.
    1. Ranson MK. Reduction of catastrophic health care expenditures by a community-based health insurance scheme in Gujarat, India: current experiences and challenges. Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80:613–621. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Criel B. District-based Health insurance in sub-Saharan Africa Part I: From Theory to Practice. Antwerp: ITG Press; 1998.

LinkOut - more resources