Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2009 Mar;62(3):296-305.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.07.002. Epub 2008 Oct 21.

Keep it simple: ranking health states yields values similar to cardinal measurement approaches

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Keep it simple: ranking health states yields values similar to cardinal measurement approaches

Benjamin M Craig et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the relationship between ordinal and cardinal valuation of health states.

Study design and setting: We analyzed rank, visual analog scale (VAS), and time trade-off (TTO) responses for 52 health states defined using the EQ-5D classification system developed by the EuroQol Group. We analyzed 179,431 responses from 11,483 subjects in eight countries: Slovenia, Argentina, Denmark, Japan, Netherlands, Spain, United Kingdom, and United States. We first compared responses across methods by frequency of ties and values below dead. Ordinal associations between methods were evaluated using Spearman's correlation and Kendall's tau. Next, we estimated numerical values from rank responses using country-specific conditional logit models. After anchoring predicted values on a common scale, we further investigated the cardinal relationships between rank, VAS, and TTO-based values using Pearson's rho and quadratic regression.

Results: For each country, rank responses are less likely than TTO responses to be tied and to indicate that states are worse than dead. In all countries, rank responses show a strong linear correlation with both TTO (Pearson's rho=0.88-0.99) and VAS (rho=0.91-0.98) responses. However, rank-based values imply greater decrements in health for mild states than cardinal values.

Conclusions: Illiteracy and innumeracy can hinder implementation of complex preference elicitation techniques in diverse settings and populations. These results indicate that ranking exercises may provide an attractive alternative for health-state valuation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
VAS and rank expected values by country. On both axes, zero represents optimal health and one represents “Immediate Death.” Abbreviations: US, United States; UK, United Kingdom; JP, Japan; NE, Netherlands; DE, Denmark; SP, Spain; AR, Argentina; SL, Slovenia.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
TTO and rank expected values by country. On both axes, zero represents optimal health and one represents “Immediate Death.” Abbreviations: US, United States; UK, United Kingdom; JP, Japan; NE, Netherlands; DE, Denmark; SP, Spain; AR, Argentina; SL, Slovenia.

References

    1. Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD. Stated choice methods: Analysis and application. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge: 2000.
    1. Koop G, Poirier DJ. Rank-ordered logit models: an empirical analysis of Ontario voter preferences. J Appl Econom. 1994;9:369–88.
    1. Beggs S, Cardell S, Hausman J. Assessing the potential demand for electric cars. J Econom. 1981;16:1–19.
    1. Adamowicz W, Louviere JJ, Swait JD. Combining stated and revealed preference methods for valuing environmental amenities. J Environ Econ Manage. 1994;26:65–84.
    1. Thurstone LL. A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review. 1927;34:273–86.

Publication types