Vascular effects of photodynamic and pulsed dye laser therapy protocols
- PMID: 18951421
- PMCID: PMC2603570
- DOI: 10.1002/lsm.20673
Vascular effects of photodynamic and pulsed dye laser therapy protocols
Abstract
Background and objective: Pulsed dye laser (PDL) treatment of cutaneous vascular lesions is associated with variable and unpredictable efficacy. Thus, alternative treatment modalities are needed. Previous in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated enhanced selective vascular destruction with benzoporphyrin derivative (BPD) monoacid ring A photodynamic therapy (PDT) followed immediately by PDL irradiation (PDT+PDL). Here, we evaluate PDT alone, PDL alone, and PDT+PDL protocols using an optimized in vivo rodent dorsal window chamber model.
Study design/materials and methods: A dorsal window chamber was surgically installed on male Golden Syrian hamsters. BPD solution was administered intravenously via a jugular venous catheter. Evaluated interventions included: (1) Control (no BPD, no light); (2) Control (BPD, no light); (3) PDT alone (lambda = 576 nm; 25, 50, 75, or 96 J/cm2 radiant exposure; 15 minutes post-BPD injection); (4) PDL alone at 7 J/cm2 (585 nm, 1.5 milliseconds pulse duration, 7 mm spot); and (5) PDT (25 or 75 J/cm2)+PDL (7 J/cm2). Laser speckle imaging was used to monitor blood flow dynamics before, immediately after, and 1, 3, and 5 days post-intervention.
Results: Perfusion reduction on day 1 post-intervention was achieved with PDT>50 J/cm2, PDL alone, and PDT+PDL. However, by day 5 post-intervention, recovery of flow was observed with PDT alone at 50 J/cm2 (-15.1%) and PDL alone (+215%). PDT (75 J/cm2)+PDL resulted in the greatest prolonged reduction in vascular perfusion (-99.8%).
Conclusions: Our in vivo data suggest that the PDT+PDL therapeutic protocol can result in enhanced and persistent vascular shutdown compared to PDT or PDL alone. The PDT+PDL approach has potential for considerable superficial vascular destruction and should be considered as a treatment modality for cutaneous vascular lesions. Monitoring of blood flow changes for as long as possible is crucial for accurate assessment of light-based vascular interventions.
(c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Figures
References
-
- Jacobs AH, Walton RG. The incidence of birthmarks in the neonate. Pediatrics. 1976;58:218–222. - PubMed
-
- Morelli JG, Huff JC, Weston WL. Treatment of congenital telangiectatic vascular malformations with the pulsed-dye laser (585 nm) Pediatrics. 1993;92:603–606. - PubMed
-
- Kelly KM, Choi B, McFarlane S, Motosue A, Jung B, Khan MH, Ramirez-San-Juan JC, Nelson JS. Description and analysis of treatments for port-wine stain birthmarks. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2005;7:287–294. - PubMed
-
- Edstrom DW, Hedblad MA, Ros AM. Flashlamp pulsed dye laser and argon-pumped dye laser in the treatment of port wine stains: A clinical and histological comparison. Br J Dermatol. 2002;146:285–289. - PubMed
-
- Kelly KM, Nanda VS, Nelson JS. Treatment of port-wine stain birthmarks using the 1.5-msec pulsed dye laser at high fluences in conjunction with cryogen spray cooling. Dermatol Surg. 2002;4:309–313. - PubMed
