Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Jan-Feb;16(1):40-6.
doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2808. Epub 2008 Oct 24.

Tiering drug-drug interaction alerts by severity increases compliance rates

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Tiering drug-drug interaction alerts by severity increases compliance rates

Marilyn D Paterno et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Objective: Few data exist measuring the effect of differentiating drug-drug interaction (DDI) alerts in computerized provider order entry systems (CPOE) by level of severity ("tiering"). We sought to determine if rates of provider compliance with DDI alerts in the inpatient setting differed when a tiered presentation was implemented.

Design: We performed a retrospective analysis of alert log data on hospitalized patients at two academic medical centers during the period from 2/1/2004 through 2/1/2005. Both inpatient CPOE systems used the same DDI checking service, but one displayed alerts differentially by severity level (tiered presentation, including hard stops for the most severe alerts) while the other did not. Participants were adult inpatients who generated a DDI alert, and providers who wrote the orders. Alerts were presented during the order entry process, providing the clinician with the opportunity to change the patient's medication orders to avoid the interaction.

Measurements: Rate of compliance to alerts at a tiered site compared to a non-tiered site.

Results: We reviewed 71,350 alerts, of which 39,474 occurred at the non-tiered site and 31,876 at the tiered site. Compliance with DDI alerts was significantly higher at the site with tiered DDI alerts compared to the non-tiered site (29% vs. 10%, p < 0.001). At the tiered site, 100% of the most severe alerts were accepted, vs. only 34% at the non-tiered site; moderately severe alerts were also more likely to be accepted at the tiered site (29% vs. 10%).

Conclusion: Tiered alerting by severity was associated with higher compliance rates of DDI alerts in the inpatient setting, and lack of tiering was associated with a high override rate of more severe alerts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Level 1 Alert, requiring one of the orders to be stopped. Since these alerts are presented at the time a drug is selected for ordering, in this example no order for lsosorbid Dinitrate has yet been written, allowing the order process to be canceled. Sildenafil has previously been ordered for this patient, however, and a discontinue order must be created, which the CPOE system will do when this option is selected.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Level 2 Alert with Override Reasons. As with the non-tiered site alerts, the clinician may choose either to keep both orders or stop one of them, and is required to choose a reason for continuing both.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Level 3 Alert. These alerts use available screen real estate and require no action at all, not even clicking an “Ok” button. The figure shows how it fits into the medication ordering screen, with an enlarged version of the alert area itself provided for clarity.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Non-tiered DDI alert screen. All alerts for the drug being ordered appear on this screen. Scrolling through the “Warnings” box displays individual messages for each alert. The action selected (Cancel or Keep) affects all the alerts shown. Selecting “Keep” opens a text box and requires a reason to be supplied.

References

    1. Shah NR, Seger AS, Seger DL, et al. Improving Acceptance of Computerized Prescribing Alerts in Ambulatory Care J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006;13:5-11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weingart SN, Toth M, Sands DZ, Aronson, MD, Davis RB, Russell SP. Physicians' Decisions to Override Computerized Drug Alerts in Primary Care Arch Intern Med 2003;163:2625-2631. - PubMed
    1. Payne TH, Nichol WP, Hoey P, Savarino J. Characteristics and override rates of order checks in a practitioner order entry system Proc AMIA Symp 2002:602-606. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Glassman PA, Simon B, Belperio P, Lanto A. Improving Recognition of Drug Interactions: Benefits and Barriers to Using Automated Drug Alerts Med Care 2002;40:1161-1171. - PubMed
    1. Bates DW, Kuperman GJ, Wang SJ, et al. Ten Commandments for Effective Clinical Decision Support: Making the Practice of evidence-based Medicine a Reality J Am Med Inf Assoc 2003;10:523-530. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types