Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007;57(7-8):509-514.
doi: 10.1007/s11199-007-9291-4.

A Linguistic Comparison of Letters of Recommendation for Male and Female Chemistry and Biochemistry Job Applicants

Toni Schmader  1 , Jessica Whitehead, Vicki H Wysocki
Affiliations

A Linguistic Comparison of Letters of Recommendation for Male and Female Chemistry and Biochemistry Job Applicants

Toni Schmader et al. Sex Roles. 2007.

Abstract

Letters of recommendation are central to the hiring process. However, gender stereotypes could bias how recommenders describe female compared to male applicants. In the current study, text analysis software was used to examine 886 letters of recommendation written on behalf of 235 male and 42 female applicants for either a chemistry or biochemistry faculty position at a large U.S. research university. Results revealed more similarities than differences in letters written for male and female candidates. However, recommenders used significantly more standout adjectives to describe male as compared to female candidates. Letters containing more standout words also included more ability words and fewer grindstone words. Research is needed to explore how differences in language use affect perceivers' evaluations of female candidates.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Biernat M, Eidelman S. Translating subjective language in letters of recommendation: The case of the sexist professor. European Journal of Social Psychology. 2007 (in press)
    1. Greenwald A, Banaji M. Implicit cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review. 1995;102:4–27. - PubMed
    1. Heilman ME. Sex stereotypes and their effects in the workplace: What we know and what we don’t know. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality. 1995;10:3–26.
    1. Heilman ME. Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues. 2001;57:657–674.
    1. Heilman ME, Martell RF, Simon MC. The vagaries of sex bias: Conditions regulating the undervaluation, equivalence, and overvaluation of female job applicants. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1988;41:98–110.