Identification of phenolic dermal sensitizers in a wound closure tape
- PMID: 18958741
- DOI: 10.1080/15476910701680236
Identification of phenolic dermal sensitizers in a wound closure tape
Abstract
A latex-allergic patient presented with a severe local reaction to a non-latex wound closure bandage following surgery. Extracts of the bandage were analyzed by gas chromatograph-electron impact-mass spectrometry (GC EI-MS) in the total ion monitoring mode. Components were identified by their ion mass fingerprint and elution time as a corresponding standard from the GC column. The chemicals identified were 4,4'-thiobis-(6-tert-butyl-m-cresol) (TBBC), 6-tert-Butyl-m-cresol (BC), 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol (BP) and erucamide (EA). Sensitization potential of these chemicals was evaluated using two quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) programs. The phenol 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-(hydroxymethyl)phenol (BHP) was also included in the test series. It was initially thought to be present in the bandage but detectable levels could not be confirmed. The potential for TBBC to induce a sensitization response was predicted by both Derek for Windows and TOPKAT 6.2. The potential for BC and BP to induce a sensitization response was predicted by Derek for Windows, but not TOPKAT. BHP and EA were not predicted to be sensitizers by either QSAR program. Local lymph node assay (LLNA) analysis of the chemicals identified TBBC, BP, and BC as potential sensitizers with EC3 values between 0.2 and 4.5%. None of the animals exhibited body weight loss or skin irritation at the concentrations tested. In agreement with the toxicological modeling, BHP did not induce a sensitization response in the LLNA. Following a positive LLNA response, TBBC, BP, and BC were further characterized by phenotypic analysis of the draining lymph nodes. A positive LLNA result coupled with a lack of increase in B220(+)IgE(+) cell and serum IgE characterize these chemicals as Type IV sensitizers. These studies used a multidisciplinary approach combining clinical observation, GC-EI-MS for chemical identification, QSAR modeling of chemicals prior to animal testing, and the LLNA for determination of the sensitization potential of chemicals in a manufactured product.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of the contact and respiratory sensitization potential of volatile organic compounds generated by simulated indoor air chemistry.Toxicol Sci. 2007 Jun;97(2):355-63. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfm043. Epub 2007 Mar 7. Toxicol Sci. 2007. PMID: 17347135
-
Evaluation of irritancy and sensitization potential of metalworking fluid mixtures and components.J Immunotoxicol. 2009 Mar;6(1):19-29. doi: 10.1080/15476910802604291. J Immunotoxicol. 2009. PMID: 19519159
-
NTP Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of 4,4'-Thiobis(6- t -butyl- m -cresol) (CAS No. 96-69-5) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Feed Studies).Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser. 1994 Dec;435:1-288. Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser. 1994. PMID: 12595928
-
Local lymph node assay (LLNA) for detection of sensitization capacity of chemicals.Methods. 2007 Jan;41(1):54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.07.006. Methods. 2007. PMID: 16938465 Review.
-
Skin irritation and sensitization: mechanisms and new approaches for risk assessment.Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2008;21(4):191-202. doi: 10.1159/000135635. Epub 2008 May 29. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2008. PMID: 18509253 Review.
Cited by
-
The LLNA: A Brief Review of Recent Advances and Limitations.J Allergy (Cairo). 2011;2011:424203. doi: 10.1155/2011/424203. Epub 2011 Jun 16. J Allergy (Cairo). 2011. PMID: 21747867 Free PMC article.
-
Applications of Tert-Butyl-Phenolic Antioxidants in Consumer Products and Their Potential Toxicities in Humans.Toxics. 2024 Nov 29;12(12):869. doi: 10.3390/toxics12120869. Toxics. 2024. PMID: 39771084 Free PMC article. Review.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous