Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2008 Oct 29:9:145.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-145.

Stay@Work: Participatory Ergonomics to prevent low back and neck pain among workers: design of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the (cost-)effectiveness

Maurice T Driessen  1 , Johannes R Anema, Karin I Proper, Paulien M Bongers, Allard J van der Beek
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Stay@Work: Participatory Ergonomics to prevent low back and neck pain among workers: design of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the (cost-)effectiveness

Maurice T Driessen et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Low back pain (LBP) and neck pain (NP) are a major public health problem with considerable costs for individuals, companies and society. Therefore, prevention is imperative. The Stay@Work study investigates the (cost-)effectiveness of Participatory Ergonomics (PE) to prevent LBP and NP among workers.

Methods: In a randomised controlled trial (RCT), a total of 5,759 workers working at 36 departments of four companies is expected to participate in the study at baseline. The departments consisting of about 150 workers are pre-stratified and randomised. The control departments receive usual practice and the intervention departments receive PE. Within each intervention department a working group is formed including eight workers, a representative of the management, and an occupational health and safety coordinator. During a one day meeting, the working group follows the steps of PE in which the most important risk factors for LBP and NP, and the most adequate ergonomic measures are identified on the basis of group consensus. The implementation of ergonomic measures at the department is performed by the working group. To improve the implementation process, so-called 'ergocoaches' are trained. The primary outcome measure is an episode of LBP and NP. Secondary outcome measures are actual use of ergonomic measures, physical workload, psychosocial workload, intensity of pain, general health status, sick leave, and work productivity. The cost-effectiveness analysis is performed from the societal and company perspective. Outcome measures are assessed using questionnaires at baseline and after 6 and 12 months. Data on the primary outcome as well as on intensity of pain, sick leave, work productivity, and health care costs are collected every 3 months.

Discussion: Prevention of LBP and NP is beneficial for workers, employers, and society. If the intervention is proven (cost-)effective, the intervention can have a major impact on LBP and NP prevention and, thereby, on work disability prevention. Results are expected in 2010.

Trial registration: ISRCTN27472278.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participants flow chart
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Picavet HS, Schouten JS. Musculoskeletal pain in The Netherlands: prevalences, consequences and risk groups, the DMC(2)-study. Pain. 2003;102:167–178. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00372-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Picavet HS, Schouten JS, Smit HA. Prevalence and consequences of low back problems in the Netherlands, working vs non-working population, the MORGEN-Study. Monitoring Project on Risk Factors for Chronic Disease. Public Health. 1999;113:73–77. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3506(99)00122-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heinrich J, Blatter MN. RSI-klachten in de Nederlandse beroepsbevolking. Trends risicofactoren en verklaringen (Work-related musculoskeletal disorders of neck an upper extremity in the Dutch working population. Trends, risk factors and explanations) Tijdschr Gezondheidsw. 2005;83:25–35.
    1. Bot SD, Waal JM van der, Terwee CB, Windt DA van der, Schellevis FG, Bouter LM, Dekker J. Incidence and prevalence of complaints of the neck an upper extremity in general practice. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64:118–123. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.019349. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ariëns GA, Bongers PM, Hoogendoorn WE, Wal G van der, van Mechelen W. High physical and psychosocial load at work and sickness absence due to neck pain. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2002;28:222–231. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data