Isopropyl alcohol compared with isopropyl alcohol plus povidone-iodine as skin preparation for prevention of blood culture contamination
- PMID: 18971366
- PMCID: PMC2620854
- DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01425-08
Isopropyl alcohol compared with isopropyl alcohol plus povidone-iodine as skin preparation for prevention of blood culture contamination
Abstract
Despite a number of studies on the efficacies of antiseptics for the prevention of blood culture contamination, it still remains unclear which antiseptic should be used. Although the combination of povidone-iodine and isopropyl alcohol has been traditionally used in many institutions, the application of povidone-iodine needs extra time, and there is little evidence that this combination could have an additive effect in reducing contamination rates. To elucidate the additive efficacy of povidone-iodine, we compared two antiseptics, 70% isopropyl alcohol only and 70% isopropyl alcohol plus povidone-iodine, in a prospective, nonrandomized, and partially blinded study in a community hospital in Japan between 1 October 2007 and 21 March 2008. All blood samples for culture were drawn by first-year residents who received formal training on collection techniques. Skin antisepsis was performed with 70% isopropyl alcohol plus povidone-iodine on all inpatient wards and with only 70% isopropyl alcohol in the emergency department. For the group of specimens from inpatient wards cultured, 13 (0.46%) of 2,797 cultures were considered contaminated. For the group of specimens from the emergency department cultured, 12 (0.42%) of 2,856 cultures were considered contaminated. There was no significant difference in the contamination rates between the two groups (relative risk, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.41 to 1.98; P = 0.80). In conclusion, the use of a single application of 70% isopropyl alcohol is a sufficient and a more cost- and time-effective method of obtaining blood samples for culture than the use of a combination of isopropyl alcohol and povidone-iodine. The extremely low contamination rates in both groups suggest that the type of antiseptic used may not be as important as the use of proper technique.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of four antiseptic preparations for skin in the prevention of contamination of percutaneously drawn blood cultures: a randomized trial.J Clin Microbiol. 2002 May;40(5):1660-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.5.1660-1665.2002. J Clin Microbiol. 2002. PMID: 11980938 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Skin antisepsis kits containing alcohol and chlorhexidine gluconate or tincture of iodine are associated with low rates of blood culture contamination.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002 Jul;23(7):397-401. doi: 10.1086/502073. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002. PMID: 12138980 Clinical Trial.
-
Blood culture contamination rates after skin antisepsis with chlorhexidine gluconate versus povidone-iodine in a pediatric emergency department.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Feb;31(2):171-6. doi: 10.1086/650201. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010. PMID: 20025532
-
Review of clinical trials of skin antiseptic agents used to reduce blood culture contamination.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Jul;28(7):892-5. doi: 10.1086/518456. Epub 2007 May 31. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007. PMID: 17564999 Review.
-
Skin preparation before surgery: options and evidence.Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2015 Feb;16(1):14-23. doi: 10.1089/sur.2015.010. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2015. PMID: 25761076 Review.
Cited by
-
High Yield of Blood Cultures in the Etiologic Diagnosis of Cellulitis, Erysipelas, and Cutaneous Abscess in Elderly Patients.Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Jun 24;9(7):ofac317. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac317. eCollection 2022 Jul. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022. PMID: 35899281 Free PMC article.
-
The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020).Acute Med Surg. 2021 Aug 26;8(1):e659. doi: 10.1002/ams2.659. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec. Acute Med Surg. 2021. PMID: 34484801 Free PMC article.
-
Risks and prevention of surgical fires : A systematic review.Anaesthesist. 2018 Jun;67(6):426-447. doi: 10.1007/s00101-018-0445-2. Epub 2018 May 15. Anaesthesist. 2018. PMID: 29766207 English.
-
Point-of-care urine Gram stain led to narrower-spectrum antimicrobial selection for febrile urinary tract infection in adolescents and adults.BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Mar 1;22(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07194-9. BMC Infect Dis. 2022. PMID: 35227212 Free PMC article.
-
The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020).J Intensive Care. 2021 Aug 25;9(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s40560-021-00555-7. J Intensive Care. 2021. PMID: 34433491 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bartlett, J. G. 2004. Decline in microbial studies for patients with pulmonary infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 39170-172. - PubMed
-
- Bates, D. W., L. Goldman, and T. H. Lee. 1991. Contaminant blood cultures and resource utilization. The true consequences of false-positive results. JAMA 265365-369. - PubMed
-
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2007. Principles and procedures for blood cultures; approved guideline. CLSI document M47-A. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical