Functional neuroanatomy of lexical processing in children with cleft lip and palate
- PMID: 18971720
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181881f54
Functional neuroanatomy of lexical processing in children with cleft lip and palate
Abstract
Background: Patients with palatal clefts are predisposed to developing speech and language abnormalities. Emerging evidence indicates that children with cleft lip and/or cleft palate have higher rates of learning disabilities than the general population and differences in brain morphology.
Methods: Magnetic resonance imaging of 12 individuals with isolated unilateral complete clefts of the lip and palate produced functional images during three lexical processing tasks: generation of verbs, opposites, and rhymes. Direct statistical comparisons were made between subjects with cleft lip and palate and controls (matched for age and performance) from an extant data set, both as a group and individually.
Results: Two types of differences were found. Compared with unaffected controls, subjects with clefts showed a delayed and elongated blood oxygen level-dependent response in regions found throughout the cerebrum, including in the prefrontal cortex, cingulate gyrus, right precuneus, and right temporal gyrus. A right middle frontal gyrus region was activated by these tasks in controls but not in subjects with clefts. Developmental analysis showed that subjects 14.5 years and older (n = 5) had a larger number of age-related regions differing in blood oxygen level-dependent response from controls than did younger subjects (n = 7). Single-patient analysis demonstrated substantial individual variability.
Conclusions: Children with cleft lip and palate, performing lexical processing tasks at a comparable level of proficiency, use a similar but nonidentical functional neuroanatomy than peers without clefts. Differing neural circuitry for language tasks and differing developmental trajectories could help explain the predisposition to velopharyngeal dysfunction and learning disabilities in this population.
Comment in
-
Are lexical processing differences in cleft lip and palate subjects inherent or secondary to velopharyngeal insufficiency?Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Jul;124(1):318-319. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a83785. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009. PMID: 19568105 No abstract available.
References
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Improved national prevalence estimates for 18 selected major birth defects: United States, 1999–2001. M.M.W.R. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 54: 1301, 2006.
-
- LaRossa, D. The state of the art in cleft palate surgery. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 37: 225, 2000.
-
- Sommerlad, B. C., Mehendale, F. V., Birch, M. J., Sell, D., Hattee, C., and Harland, K. Palate re-repair revisited. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 39: 295, 2002.
-
- Senders, C. W. Management of velopharyngeal competence. Facial Plast. Surg. Clin. North Am. 9: 27, 2001.
-
- Shinagawa, H., Ono, T., Honda, E., Kurabayashi, T., Iriki, A., and Ohyama, K. Distinctive cortical articulatory representation in cleft lip and palate: A preliminary functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 43: 620, 2006.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
