Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Jan;88(1):21-9.
doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31818e00bd.

The feasibility of hypnotic analgesia in ameliorating pain and anxiety among adults undergoing needle electromyography

David Slack  1 , Lonnie Nelson, David Patterson, Stephen Burns, Kevin Hakimi, Lawrence Robinson
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The feasibility of hypnotic analgesia in ameliorating pain and anxiety among adults undergoing needle electromyography

David Slack et al. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: Our hypothesis was that hypnotic analgesia reduces pain and anxiety during electromyography (EMG).

Design: We performed a prospective randomized, controlled clinical trial at outpatient electrodiagnostic clinics in teaching hospitals. Just before EMG, 26 subjects were randomized to one of three 20-min audio programs: education about EMG (EDU) (n = 8); hypnotic induction without analgesic suggestion (n = 10); or hypnotic induction with analgesic suggestion (n = 8). The blinded electromyographer provided a posthypnotic suggestion at the start of EMG. After EMG, subjects rated worst and average pain and anxiety using visual analog scales.

Results: Mean values for the EDU, hypnotic induction without analgesic suggestion, and hypnotic induction with analgesic suggestion groups were not significantly different (mean +/- SD): worst pain 67 +/- 25, 42 +/- 18, and 49 +/- 30; average pain 35 +/- 26, 27 +/- 14, and 25 +/- 22; and anxiety 44 +/- 41, 42 +/- 23, and 22 +/- 24. When hypnosis groups were merged (n = 18) and compared with the EDU condition (n = 8), average and worst pain and anxiety were less for the hypnosis group than EDU, but this was statistically significant only for worst pain (hypnosis, 46 +/- 24 vs. EDU, 67 +/- 35; P = 0.049) with a 31% average reduction.

Conclusions: A short hypnotic induction seems to reduce worst pain during electromyography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient Rating of Worst Pain by Hypnosis vs. No Hypnosis
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sub-group Analysis: Interaction Effects of Hypnosis and Absorption on Worst Pain
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Gans BM, Kraft GH. Pain perception in clinical electromyography. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1977;58:13–16. - PubMed
    1. Wee AS, et al. Pain perception to nerve conduction and needle electromyographic procedures. J Miss State Med Ass. 2004;45:327–30. - PubMed
    1. La Joie WI. Analgesia in Electromyography. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1963;44:42–44. - PubMed
    1. Spence WR, Guyton JD. Control of pain during electromyography. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1966;47:771–5. - PubMed
    1. Patterson DR, Jensen MP. Hypnosis and clinical pain. Psychol Bull. 2003;129:495–521. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms